The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of Oral Reading Miscues: Applied Psycholinguistics
Abstract
PRESENTS a theoretical argument that reading must be considered a psycholinguistic process. In discussion of this process, the reader is viewed as a user of language who processes three kinds of information, grapho-phonic, syntactic, and semantic, as he reacts to the graphic display on the page. In comparing unexpected responses in oral reading to expected responses, the phycholinguistic reading process is revealed. A taxonomy of cues and miscues in reading is presented for the depth analysis of oral reading phenomena. This taxonomy has been developed in close relationship to the theory and has been perfected in use in a continuing series of depth studies of oral reading.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Share, D. L. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584 · Cited by 1,022
A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading
van Orden, G. C. (1987) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197716 · Cited by 867
Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts
Bloom, P. A., & Fischler, I. (1980) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03213783 · Cited by 278
Background Knowledge, Linguistic Complexity, and Second-Language Reading Comprehension
Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (1998) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1080/10862969809547998 · Cited by 138
Scaffolding Beginning Readers: Micro and Macro Cues Teachers Use During Student Oral Reading
Cole, A. D. (2006) · The Reading Teacher · doi:10.1598/rt.59.5.4 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodman, K. S.
- Venue
- Reading Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1969
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9
- ISSN
- 0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008417758
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Oral Reading Miscues: Applied Psycholinguistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/747158
- The paper
- Goodman, K. S. (1969). Analysis of Oral Reading Miscues: Applied Psycholinguistics. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/747158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
