The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acquisition of Reading in a Second Language
Abstract
THE PURPOSE of this longitudinal study was to investigate differences in reading acquisition processes between children learning to read in their native language and children learning to read in a second language. The author studied Dutch children and Turkish children as they learned to read in Dutch during the first two grades of primary school in the Netherlands. The children were given a number of tasks to test the efficiency of both word recognition (for words of varying familiarity and complexity) and comprehension processes (including text coherence, anaphoric reference, and inferences). The Turkish children were found to be less efficient in various reading processes in Dutch than their monolingual Dutch peers. However, there was evidence from both word recognition and reading comprehension tasks that Turkish and Dutch children rely on highly comparable strategies. The results from both series of tasks as well as data on the Turkish children's oral proficiency in Dutch and their sociocultural orientation were combined into a structural model to examine the interactions between the various reading processes in Dutch. During the first two grades, both word recognition and reading comprehension appear to be most strongly influenced by children's oral proficiency in the second language. This finding suggests that children learning to read in a second language should be helped to build up their oral skills, and that reading instruction should be matched to those skills.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Linguistic Interdependence and the Educational Development of Bilingual Children
Cummins, J. (1979) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1169960 · Cited by 3,318
Cited by
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction
(2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203839089 · Cited by 916
Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness.
Durgunoğlu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.453 · Cited by 772
CARLO, M. S., AUGUST, D., MCLAUGHLIN, B., SNOW, C. E., DRESSLER, C., LIPPMAN, D. N., LIVELY, T. J., & WHITE, C. E. (2004) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.39.2.3 · Cited by 747
Proctor, C. P., August, D., Carlo, M. S., & Snow, C. (2006) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.159 · Cited by 365
Transfer in Bilingual Development: The Linguistic Interdependence Hypothesis Revisited
Verhoeven, L. T. (1994) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01112.x · Cited by 360
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Verhoeven, L. T.
- Venue
- Reading Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 90
- ISSN
- 0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988712983
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.