Cited by 360Language Development and DisordersMultilingual Education and PolicyReading and Literacy Development

Transfer in Bilingual Development: The Linguistic Interdependence Hypothesis Revisited

Verhoeven, Ludo T·1994·Language Learning

Abstract

This study aimed to find empirical evidence for the linguistic interdependence hypothesis, which states that in bilingual development, language and literacy skills can be transferred from one language to another. Ninety‐eight 6‐year‐old Turkish children, living in the Netherlands since infancy, were selected prior to their entrance into the first grade of primary school. A longitudinal design monitored the development of lexical, morphosyntactic, pragmatic, phonological, and literacy abilities in the children's first and second languages. To minimize test‐bias, I developed linguistic tasks, which required minimal instruction, analyzing interdependence relationships in bilingual development with LISREL techniques. The results clearly show that at the level of lexicon and syntax, language transfer was quite limited. At the level of pragmatic skills, phonological skills, and literacy skills, however, positive evidence appeared for the interdependence in bilingual development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01112.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study does not confirm the hypothesis advanced by Verhoeven (1994) and Proctor et al. (2010) that SES-context would play a role in linguistic interdependence, at least not in relation to receptive vocabulary in emergent bilingual children.

    “Hence, our study does not confirm the hypothesis advanced by Verhoeven (1994) and Proctor et al. (2010), amongst others, that SES-context would play a role in linguistic interdependence - at least not in relation to receptive vocabulary in emergent bilingual children.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verhoeven, L. T.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Verhoeven, Ludo T
Venue
Language Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-09
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
381-415
ISSN
  • 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9922
OpenAlex
W2111403529
Cited by
360
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Language Learning (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
linguistic interdependence hypothesis, language transfer, bilingual language acquisition, Turkish-speaking children, second language acquisition, literacy development, pragmatic competence, phonological skills, vocabulary, morphosyntax

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review