Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Effectiveness of a Direct Instruction Paradigm for Teaching Main Idea Comprehension

Baumann, James F.·1984·Reading Research Quarterly

Abstract

THIS STUDY investigated the effectiveness of a direct instruction model for teaching children the comprehension skill of main idea. Sixty-six, sixth-grade students, blocked on achievement level, were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups: a Strategy group, in which subjects received intensive main idea instruction according to a direct instruction paradigm developed by the author; a Basal group, in which subjects were administered massed basal lessons on main idea comprehension from a current, popular basal series; or a Control group, in which subjects engaged in unrelated vocabulary development exercises. A series of dependent measures assessing students' ability to recognize and produce explicit and implicit main ideas at the paragraph and short passage levels indicated a powerful treatment effect favoring the Strategy group over both the Basal and Control groups. These results are interpreted as further support for the efficacy of a direct instruction paradigm for teaching children reading comprehension skills.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/747654

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Baumann, J. F.
Venue
Reading Research Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1984
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
93
ISSN
0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972327776
Cited by
164
References
0
FWCI
13.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effectiveness of a Direct Instruction Paradigm for Teaching Main Idea Comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/747654
The paper
Baumann, J. F. (1984). The Effectiveness of a Direct Instruction Paradigm for Teaching Main Idea Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/747654

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.