Cited by 756Second Language Acquisition and LearningReading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and Disorders

Vocabulary Acquisition from Listening to Stories

Elley, Warwick B.·1989·Reading Research Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/747863

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An incidental focus on feedback on form by teachers during communicative classroom interaction results in significant learning.

    “Elley (1989) found that an incidental focus on feedback on form by teachers during communicati v e classroom interaction resulted in significant learning.”

    From The Four Strands (2007) · cites this paper as Elley (1989)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elley, W. B.
Affiliations
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Corresponding author
Elley, Warwick B.
Venue
Reading Research Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1989
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
174
ISSN
0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011991919
Cited by
756
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 34
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reading Research Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
vocabulary acquisition, listening comprehension, story listening, narrative language, word learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review