Cited by 120Educational Games and GamificationSecond Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Educational games as stand‐alone learning tools and their motivational effect on L 2 vocabulary acquisition and perceived learning gains

Calvo‐Ferrer, José Ramón·2017·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

Abstract According to different authors, computer games not only teach contents and skills, but also do so in a more efficient manner, allowing long‐lasting learning. However, there is still little consensus on this matter as different studies put their educational benefits into question, especially when used without instructional support. An empirical study was conducted to measure the effect of the educational game T he C onference I nterpreter on L 2 vocabulary acquisition and perceived learning gains, as compared with a non‐gaming tool which replicated its contents. The results of pre‐, post‐ and delayed tests showed that students that had access to the contents via the video game performed statistically better in the short run, found the materials more appealing and believed their vocabulary skills had developed further than those in the control group. However, the regression model showed that the actual enjoyment of the game seemed to have no effect on the students' learning outcomes, neither according to their own estimation nor as determined by testing. Of greater importance seemed to be extrinsic motivation, ie, their desire to play based upon expected learning gains, prior knowledge of tested L 2 vocabulary and perceived difficulty of the educational contents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjet.12387

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants with high proficiency in English may benefit more from the learning affordances provided by digital-game based scenarios.

    “This is also in line with previous research carried out by the researchers [76-79], which suggests that participants with high proficiency in English may benefit more from the learning affordances provided by digital-game based scenarios.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calvo‐Ferrer, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Alicante (ES)
Corresponding author
Calvo‐Ferrer, José Ramón
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-23
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
264-278
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W2214217453
Cited by
120
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3
FWCI
14.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
  • RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
game-based learning, second language vocabulary acquisition, extrinsic motivation, perceived learning gains, video games, game enjoyment, delayed retention, perceived difficulty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review