Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 647

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery

Whitaker, Gordon P.·1980·Public Administration Review

Abstract

which it was applied. Second, the automated selection of high priority cases by PROMIS was used as a back-up for manual selection during much of the first two years of operation. Eventually the automated selection of high priority cases for special pretrial preparation was discontinued. These factors suggest that, while the PROMIS development may have been instrumental in the establishment of the Special Litigation Unit, the operation of the Special Litigation Unit soon became relatively independent of PROMIS. A more rigorous evaluation, if it named anything, might have named the Special Litigation Unit as an exemplary project rather than the PROMIS system as a whole. An implementation analysis of the type presented here was not conducted. Instead, LEAA relied on information provided by project participants in making the designation decision. 14. Marketing activities include: distribution of a nontechnical description of PROMIS, videotape and film presentations, demonstrations at conventions such as those of the National District Attorney's Association, the conduct of quarterly meetings of adopters and potential adopters, publication of a quarterly newsletter, the conduct of on-site feasibility studies, and preparation of benefit-cost analyses for justifying PROMIS to local funding sources. 15. Technical assistance is provided by INSLAW personnel through site visits as well as through telephone and written communications. It includes help in planning projects; writing requests for proposals and selecting contractors; installing, testing, and modifying the basic software; and establishing training programs. 16. David L. Weimer, The Inducement and Implementation of Innovations for Prosecution Management, Dissertation, Graduate School of Public Policy, University of California at Berkeley, May 1978.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/975377

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 647

Metadata

Authors
Whitaker, G. P.
Venue
Public Administration Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1980-05
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
240
ISSN
0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016851153
Cited by
647
References
0
FWCI
41.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/975377
The paper
Whitaker, G. P. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/975377

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.