The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept
Abstract
In a recent essay in The New Republic, Kirk Cheyfitz laments the rise of the Self-Serve City in Detroit. Sparked by double-digit inflation and unemployment rates, Detroit Mayor Coleman Young in his annual budget message to the city council announced that: It may very well be that for the near future we will have to get used to doing for our city that we have come to expect our city to do for us.' To what types of things was Mayor Young referring?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies
Meijer, A. (2015) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001 · Cited by 365
Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/muq092 · Cited by 328
Contextualizing co-production of health care: a systematic literature review
Palumbo, R. (2016) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-07-2015-0125 · Cited by 292
Toward an institutional theory of citizen coproduction
Kiser, L. L. (1984) · Urban Affairs Quarterly · doi:10.1177/004208168401900406 · Cited by 32
Renegotiating Public Value with Co-Production
Cordella, A., Paletti, A., & Shaikh, M. (2018) · Oxford Scholarship Online · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0008 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1983-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321590824
- Cited by
- 709
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/975300
- The paper
- Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1983). Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/975300
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
