CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: Food Sovereignty and the Agrarian Question: Constructing Convergence of Struggles within Diversity

Amin, Samir·2015·The Struggle for Food Sovereignty
DOI 10.2307/j.ctt183p7ck.6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctt183p7ck.6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amin defended food sovereignty as the foundation of political sovereignty.

    “And he defended food sovereignty as the foundation of political sovereignty (Amin 2015).”

    From The hidden legacy of Samir Amin: delinking’s ecological foundation (2021) · cites this paper as Amin 2015

  • Amin insisted that such projects needed a clear sense of the class that would be sovereign, rather than simply resting on a loose populism.

    “However, he insisted that such projects needed a clear sense of the class that would be sovereign, rather than simply resting on a loose populism (Amin 2015;Shivji 2019).”

    From The hidden legacy of Samir Amin: delinking’s ecological foundation (2021) · cites this paper as Amin 2015

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Amin, S.
Venue
The Struggle for Food Sovereignty
Publisher
Pluto Press
Published
2015-07-20
Pages
14-34
DOI
10.2307/j.ctt183p7ck.6
Cited by
5
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review