Radiocarbon Dates
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two charcoal samples and one ostrich eggshell fragment from Kadesh-Barnea provided dates in the middle of the 2nd millennium BCE, too high according to all chronology systems.
“Two charcoal samples and 1 ostrich eggshell fragment from Kadesh-Barnea provided dates too high according to all chronology systems-in the middle of the 2nd millennium BCE (Carmi and Segal 2007).”
From Radiocarbon Results from the Iron IIA Site of Atar Haroa in the Negev Highlands and their Archaeological and Historical Implications (2010) · cites this paper as Carmi and Segal 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boaretto, E., Finkelstein, I., & Shahack-Gross, R. (2010) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200044982 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Carmi, I., & Segal, D.
- ORCID
- Carmi, Israel
- Venue
- Excavations at Kadesh Barnea (Tell el-Qudeirat) 1976-1982
- Publisher
- Israel Antiquities Authority
- Published
- 2007-01-01
- Pages
- 303-306
- OpenAlex
- W4390121397
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- radiocarbon dating, carbon-14, chronology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
