The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Savage Kin: Indigenous Informants and American Anthropologists
Abstract
"Illuminating the complex relationships between tribal informants and twentieth-century anthropologists such as Boas, Parker, and Fenton, who came to their communities to collect stories and artifacts"...Provided by publisher
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anthropological myths, including those constructed out of the archaeological past, have contributed to willful misunderstanding, simplistic representations, and erasure of the lifeways of BIPoC, people with disabilities, LGBTQIA+ individuals and communities, migrants, women, and children.
“Anthropological myths, including those constructed out of the archaeological past, have contributed to willful misunderstanding, simplistic representations, and in many cases erasure of the lifeways of Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPoC), people with disabilities, LGBTQIA+ individuals and communities, migrants, women, and children (cf.Bruchac, 2018).”
From Archaeology in 2022: Counter‐myths for hopeful futures (2024) · cites this paper as Bruchac, 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Archaeology in 2022: Counter‐myths for hopeful futures
Collective, B. T., Berihuete‐Azorín, M., Blackmore, C., Borck, L., Flexner, J. L., Frieman, C. J., Herrmann, C. A., & Kiddey, R. (2024) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13940 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruchac, M. M.
- Publisher
- University of Arizona Press
- Published
- 2018-04-10
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
