Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,648

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Organizational Learning: Institutionalizing Ignorance

·2018·Averting Extinction

Abstract

List of figures. List of tables. Acknowledgments. Preface. Introduction: The Evolving Field of Organizational Learning. Part I: Organizational Defences:. 1. Making Sense of Limited Learning. 2. Tacit Knowledge and Management. 3. Why Individuals and Organizations Have Difficulty in Double--Loop Learning. 4. Creating a Theory of Practice: The Case of Organizational Paradoxes. 5. Todaya s Problems with Tomorrowa s Organizations. 6. Teaching Smart People How to Learn. 7. A Leadership Dilemma: Skilled Incompetence. Part II: Inhibiting Organizational Learning and Effectiveness:. 8. Organizational Learning and Management Information Systems. 9. Strategy Implementation: An Experiment in Learning. 10. How Strategy Professionals Deal with Threat: Individual and Organizational. 11. The Dilemma of Implementing Controls: The Case of Managerial Accounting. 12. Human Problems with Budgets. 13. Bridging Economics and Psychology: The Case of the Economics Theory of the Firm. Part III: The Counterproductive Consequences of Organizational Development and Human Resource Activities:. 14. Good Communication That Blocks Learning. 15. Reasoning, Action Strategies, and Defensive Routines: The Case of OD Practitioners. 16. Inappropriate Defences Against The Monitoring of Organizational Development Practice. 17. Do Personal Growth Laboratories Represent an Alternative Culture?. Part IV: The Inhibition of Valid and Usable Information from the Correct Use of Normal Science:. 18. Actionable Knowledge: Design Causality in the Service of Consequential Theory. 19. Field Theory as a Basis for Scholarly Consulting. 20. Unrecognized Defences of Scholars Impact on Theory and Research. 21. Seeking Truth and Actionable Knowledge: How the Scientific Method Inhibits Both. 22. Problems and New Directions for Industrial Psychology. 23. The Incompleteness of Social--Psychological Theory: Examples from Small Group, Cognitive Consistency, and Attribution Research. 24. Dangers in Applying Results from Experimental Social Psychology. 25. Making Knowledge More Relevant to Practice: Maps for Action. 26. Participatory Action Research and Action Science Compared. 27. Some Unintended Consequences of Rigorous Research. Index.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctt211qx7g.13

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,648

Metadata

Venue
Averting Extinction
Published
2018-03-02
Pages
122-135
OpenAlex
W1538749266
Cited by
1,648
References
1
FWCI
142.69
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Learning: Institutionalizing Ignorance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/j.ctt211qx7g.13
The paper
Organizational Learning: Institutionalizing Ignorance. (2018). Averting Extinction. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt211qx7g.13

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.