The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organizational Learning: Institutionalizing Ignorance
Abstract
List of figures. List of tables. Acknowledgments. Preface. Introduction: The Evolving Field of Organizational Learning. Part I: Organizational Defences:. 1. Making Sense of Limited Learning. 2. Tacit Knowledge and Management. 3. Why Individuals and Organizations Have Difficulty in Double--Loop Learning. 4. Creating a Theory of Practice: The Case of Organizational Paradoxes. 5. Todaya s Problems with Tomorrowa s Organizations. 6. Teaching Smart People How to Learn. 7. A Leadership Dilemma: Skilled Incompetence. Part II: Inhibiting Organizational Learning and Effectiveness:. 8. Organizational Learning and Management Information Systems. 9. Strategy Implementation: An Experiment in Learning. 10. How Strategy Professionals Deal with Threat: Individual and Organizational. 11. The Dilemma of Implementing Controls: The Case of Managerial Accounting. 12. Human Problems with Budgets. 13. Bridging Economics and Psychology: The Case of the Economics Theory of the Firm. Part III: The Counterproductive Consequences of Organizational Development and Human Resource Activities:. 14. Good Communication That Blocks Learning. 15. Reasoning, Action Strategies, and Defensive Routines: The Case of OD Practitioners. 16. Inappropriate Defences Against The Monitoring of Organizational Development Practice. 17. Do Personal Growth Laboratories Represent an Alternative Culture?. Part IV: The Inhibition of Valid and Usable Information from the Correct Use of Normal Science:. 18. Actionable Knowledge: Design Causality in the Service of Consequential Theory. 19. Field Theory as a Basis for Scholarly Consulting. 20. Unrecognized Defences of Scholars Impact on Theory and Research. 21. Seeking Truth and Actionable Knowledge: How the Scientific Method Inhibits Both. 22. Problems and New Directions for Industrial Psychology. 23. The Incompleteness of Social--Psychological Theory: Examples from Small Group, Cognitive Consistency, and Attribution Research. 24. Dangers in Applying Results from Experimental Social Psychology. 25. Making Knowledge More Relevant to Practice: Maps for Action. 26. Participatory Action Research and Action Science Compared. 27. Some Unintended Consequences of Rigorous Research. Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
Cited by
Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models
Bontis, N. (1998) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251749810204142 · Cited by 3,276
Steps toward a science of service systems
Spohrer, J., Maglio, P. P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2007.33 · Cited by 1,264
Collective Efficacy Beliefs:Theoretical Developments, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033003003 · Cited by 1,207
TOWARD A THEORY OF MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT
Afzalur Rahim, M. (2002) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/eb022874 · Cited by 953
Somech, A. (2006) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305277799 · Cited by 563
Metadata
- Venue
- Averting Extinction
- Publisher
- Yale University Press
- Published
- 2018-03-02
- Pages
- 122-135
- OpenAlex
- W1538749266
- Cited by
- 1,648
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 142.69
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Learning: Institutionalizing Ignorance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/j.ctt211qx7g.13
- The paper
- Organizational Learning: Institutionalizing Ignorance. (2018). Averting Extinction. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt211qx7g.13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.