The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collective Efficacy Beliefs:Theoretical Developments, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions
Abstract
This analysis synthesizes existing research to discuss how teachers’ practice and student learning are affected by perceptions of collective efficacy. Social cognitive theory is employed to explain that the choices teachers make—the ways in which they exercise personal agency—are strongly influenced by collective efficacy beliefs. Although empirically related, teacher and collective efficacy perceptions are theoretically distinct constructs, each having unique effects on educational decisions and student achievement. Our purpose is to advance awareness about perceived collective efficacy and develop a conceptual model to explain the formation and influence of perceived collective efficacy in schools. We also examine the relevance of efficacy beliefs to teachers’ professional work and outline future research possibilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,281
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 19,180
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6637 · Cited by 16,594
Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.918 · Cited by 11,999
(1951) · Cited by 8,693
Gamst, F. C. (1991) · Anthropology of Work Review · doi:10.1525/awr.1991.12.3.19 · Cited by 7,932
Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning
Bandura, A. (1993) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3 · Cited by 7,655
Cited by
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308325693 · Cited by 3,686
The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003 · Cited by 1,976
Self-citationTeacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001 · Cited by 1,787
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315626801 · Cited by 1,774
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611 · Cited by 1,678
Metadata
- Authors
- Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W.
- Venue
- Educational Researcher
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3-13
- ISSN
- 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-102X
- OpenAlex
- W2101457347
- Cited by
- 1,207
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 116.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collective Efficacy Beliefs:Theoretical Developments, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3102/0013189x033003003
- The paper
- Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective Efficacy Beliefs:Theoretical Developments, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x033003003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
