From Asylum to Community: Mental Health Policy in Modern America
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Therapy often stretches beyond individualistic client-therapist interactions to a relationship with the client's community as a whole, and can be ineffective without it.
“Therapy often stretches beyond the individualistic clienttherapist interactions [61] to a relationship with the client's community as a whole [23], and can be ineffective without it [60].”
From Expressing stigma and inappropriate responses prevents LLMs from safely replacing mental health providers. (2025) · cites this paper as [60]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Moore, J., Grabb, D., Agnew, W., Klyman, K., Chancellor, S., Ong, D. C., & Haber, N. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732039 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grob, G. N.
- Corresponding author
- Grob, Gerald N.
- Venue
- Princeton University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2014-07-01
- OpenAlex
- W4238837918
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.24
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Keywords
- asylum, community, mental illness, psychiatric nursing, deinstitutionalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review