Les peintures sur vases de Nagada I - Nagada II: Nouvelle approche sémiologique de l'iconographie prédynastique
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Marl clay vessels were also the surface for a new and standardized visual culture, referred to as 'Decorated ware' (D-ware).
“Marl clay vessels were also the surface for a new and standardized visual culture, referred to as ''Decorated ware'' (D-ware) (Fig. 2), the red-painted iconography of which has continued to garner substantial attention and synthesis, albeit often quite speculative (Graff 2004(Graff , 2009)).”
From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Graff 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation
Stevenson, A. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-016-9094-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“2), the red-painted iconography of which has continued to garner substantial attention and synthesis, albeit often quite speculative (Graff 2004, 2009).”
Background
- Authors
- GRAFF, G.
- Corresponding author
- GRAFF, Gwenola
- Venue
- Leuven University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Leuven University Press
- Published
- 2009-03-01
- OpenAlex
- W2619858749
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- book
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Leuven University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
- Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Keywords
- pottery painting, painted ceramics, Predynastic Egypt, Naqada culture, ancient Egyptian art
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
