CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Native Providence: Memory, Community, and Survivance in the Northeast

Rubertone, Patricia E.·2020
DOI 10.2307/j.ctv17ppct6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctv17ppct6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Camorim community currently houses people who have inherited multiple memories, both of slavery and free labor, with family histories of the life and practices of the past that intersect with their own in the present, constituting a mosaic of resistance, survival, and persistence against the accentuated gentrification process the region has been subjected to for decades.

    “It currently houses people who have inherited multiple memories, both of slavery and free labor, with family histories of the life and practices of the past that intersect with their own in the present, constituting a mosaic of resistance, survival, and persistence (Rubertone, 2020) against the accentuated gentrification process the region has been subjected to for decades (Peixoto, 2015).”

    From Archaeologies of gender, kinship, and mobility in Southeast Brazil: genealogies of Tupiniquim women and the itinerancy of ceramic practices (2023) · cites this paper as Rubertone, 2020

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rubertone, P. E.
Publisher
Nebraska
Published
2020-12-01
DOI
10.2307/j.ctv17ppct6
Cited by
14
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review