The DOI matches its Crossref record.
APA Concise Dictionary of Psychology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Definitions for the domains and constructs were selected or constructed from dictionaries and internet sources, evaluated by the authors of the original framework, and agreed by consensus.
“Definitions for the domains and constructs were selected or constructed from dictionaries, (e.g., American Psychological Association Dictionary of Psychology [36]), and internet sources (e.g.http://www.oed.com). Each definition was evaluated by the authors of the original framework and definitions were agreed by consensus.”
From Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research (2012) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Framework for Emotion-Oriented Requirements Change Handling in Agile Software Engineering
Madampe, K., Hoda, R., & Grundy, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2023.3253145 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- American Psychological Association
- Venue
- American Psychological Association eBooks
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- OpenAlex
- W4238508160
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychological Association eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Lexicography and Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- psychology, psychological terminology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
