CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Judicial and Constitutional StudiesLegal Systems and Judicial ProcessesLegal processes and jurisprudence

The Jurisdictional Jungle: NAVIGATING THE PATH

Cardani, John F.·2009·Criminal Justice in Native America
DOI 10.2307/j.ctv1gwqrbv.12
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctv1gwqrbv.12

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Native American tribes and Alaskan Native communities are sovereign but colonized nations, and their experience with US criminal justice reflects this.

    “Native American tribes and Alaskan Native communities are sovereign but colonized nations, and their experience with US criminal justice reflects this (Cardani 2009, Nielsen 2009).”

    From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Cardani 2009

  • Cardani (2009) aptly called the complexities and variations of Indian Country criminal justice a jurisdictional jungle.

    “Cardani (2009) aptly called the complexities and variations of Indian Country criminal justice a jurisdictional jungle.”

    From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Cardani (2009)

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Cardani, J. F.
Corresponding author
Cardani, John F.
Venue
Criminal Justice in Native America
Publisher
University of Arizona Press
Published
2009-04-09
Pages
114-133
DOI
10.2307/j.ctv1gwqrbv.12
OpenAlex
W3135843634
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.26
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Arizona Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Judicial and Constitutional Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
Keywords
jurisdiction, legal pluralism, jurisdictional overlap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review