Introduction to the Context of Native American Criminal Justice Involvement
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Examinations of the Native American experience in the US criminal justice system are still relatively sparse despite earlier calls for increased attention.
“Examinations of the Native American experience in the US criminal justice system are still relatively sparse, despite earlier calls for increased attention to Native American crime and justice issues.”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Nielsen 2009
Native Americans' status as both tribal nationals and US citizens uniquely shapes their experiences of agency and power, as they are subjected to internal colonialism across multiple interlocking institutional spheres, including criminal justice.
“This intersection uniquely shapes their experiences of agency and power, as they are subjected to internal colonialism across multiple interlocking institutional spheres (Steinman 2012), including criminal justice (Nielsen 2009).”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Nielsen 2009
Native Americans have higher imprisonment rates than any other group except African Americans.
“Victimization rates among Native Americans have traditionally been more than twice the national average, and Native Americans have higher imprisonment rates than any other group except African Americans (Nielsen 2009, US Dep. Justice 2004).”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Nielsen 2009
Native American tribes and Alaskan Native communities are sovereign but colonized nations, and their experience with US criminal justice reflects this.
“Native American tribes and Alaskan Native communities are sovereign but colonized nations, and their experience with US criminal justice reflects this (Cardani 2009, Nielsen 2009).”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Nielsen 2009
Victimization rates among Native Americans have traditionally been more than twice the national average.
“Victimization rates among Native Americans have traditionally been more than twice the national average, and Native Americans have higher imprisonment rates than any other group except African Americans (Nielsen 2009, US Dep. Justice 2004).”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Nielsen 2009
The Native American criminal justice experience is inherently shaped by the history of US internal colonialism, which is not accounted for by racial/ethnic group threat explanations.
“Like Nielsen (2009), we view the Native American criminal justice experience as inherently shaped by the history of US internal colonialism, which is not accounted for by racial/ethnic group threat explanations.”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Nielsen (2009)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 6
- Authors
- Nielsen, M. O.
- Corresponding author
- Nielsen, Marianne O.
- Venue
- Criminal Justice in Native America
- Publisher
- University of Arizona Press
- Published
- 2009-04-09
- Pages
- 1-17
- OpenAlex
- W3135831180
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Arizona Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Keywords
- indigenous peoples, criminal justice involvement, tribal courts, incarceration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review