Cited by 6Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyIndigenous Peoples' Rights and Law

Introduction to the Context of Native American Criminal Justice Involvement

Nielsen, Marianne O.·2009·Criminal Justice in Native America

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctv1gwqrbv.5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Examinations of the Native American experience in the US criminal justice system are still relatively sparse despite earlier calls for increased attention.

    “Examinations of the Native American experience in the US criminal justice system are still relatively sparse, despite earlier calls for increased attention to Native American crime and justice issues.”

    From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Nielsen 2009

  • Native Americans' status as both tribal nationals and US citizens uniquely shapes their experiences of agency and power, as they are subjected to internal colonialism across multiple interlocking institutional spheres, including criminal justice.

    “This intersection uniquely shapes their experiences of agency and power, as they are subjected to internal colonialism across multiple interlocking institutional spheres (Steinman 2012), including criminal justice (Nielsen 2009).”

    From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Nielsen 2009

  • Native Americans have higher imprisonment rates than any other group except African Americans.

    “Victimization rates among Native Americans have traditionally been more than twice the national average, and Native Americans have higher imprisonment rates than any other group except African Americans (Nielsen 2009, US Dep. Justice 2004).”

    From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Nielsen 2009

  • Native American tribes and Alaskan Native communities are sovereign but colonized nations, and their experience with US criminal justice reflects this.

    “Native American tribes and Alaskan Native communities are sovereign but colonized nations, and their experience with US criminal justice reflects this (Cardani 2009, Nielsen 2009).”

    From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Nielsen 2009

  • Victimization rates among Native Americans have traditionally been more than twice the national average.

    “Victimization rates among Native Americans have traditionally been more than twice the national average, and Native Americans have higher imprisonment rates than any other group except African Americans (Nielsen 2009, US Dep. Justice 2004).”

    From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Nielsen 2009

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 6

Authors
Nielsen, M. O.
Corresponding author
Nielsen, Marianne O.
Venue
Criminal Justice in Native America
Published
2009-04-09
Pages
1-17
OpenAlex
W3135831180
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of Arizona Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Keywords
indigenous peoples, criminal justice involvement, tribal courts, incarceration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review