Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Conclusion: Anthros, Indians, and Planetary Reality

DELORIA, VINE·1997·Indians and Anthropologists

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctv1jf2d9c.18

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deloria argued that if anthropologists speak critically to the shortcomings of their own society using knowledge derived from tribal peoples, that will signal that something of real value is contained within the tribal context.

    “If, however, anthropologists and other social scientists begin to speak critically to the shortcomings of their own society using the knowledge which they claim to have derived from observation of the tribal peoples, that will be a signal that something of real value is contained within the tribal context.”
  • Deloria argued that as long as anthropology focuses on Indians and other tribal peoples and reports back to its own society about them, there is no respect for tribal peoples.

    “As long as anthropology and anthropologists focus on Indians and other tribal peoples and report back to their own society about the quaint and sometimes romantic people they are studying, there is no respect for tribal peoples in spite of the pious disclaimers and pledges of emotional allegiance given by scholars.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
DELORIA, V.
Venue
Indians and Anthropologists
Published
1997-02-01
Pages
209-222
Cited by
46
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review