The Three Temples: On the Emergence of Jewish Mysticism
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is hard to accept the notion that the Qumran calendar was a strictly solar one, standing in polemic against the evil lunar calendar.
“This fact makes it hard to accept the notion-prevalent in earlier stages of scholarship-that the Qumran calendar was a strictly solar one, standing in polemic against the evil lunar calendar (Talmon 1958;1999;Elior 2004).”
From Qumran Calendars: A Survey of Scholarship 1980—2007 (2008) · cites this paper as Elior 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qumran Calendars: A Survey of Scholarship 1980—2007
Ben-Dov, J., & Saulnier, S. (2008) · Currents in Biblical Research · doi:10.1177/1476993x08094026 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
The Tradition of the 364-Day Calendar versus the Calendar Polemic in Second Temple Judaism
Klukowski, M. J. (2020) · Verbum Vitae · doi:10.31743/vv.4831 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- ELIOR, R.
- Corresponding author
- ELIOR, RACHEL
- Venue
- Littman Library of Jewish Civilization eBooks
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- OpenAlex
- W4247155479
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Littman Library of Jewish Civilization eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Religious Tourism and Spaces
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
