The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Why Am I Ephemeral?: Foregrounding Ndee Perceptions of Our Past as Persistence
Abstract
Various terms and descriptions have been used to explain the lack of visibility of Ndee (Apache) landscape occupations and material traces over time. Such terms as low-visibility, highly mobile, and ephemeral are abundant in the archaeological and anthropological literature in reference to Ndee groups throughout the U.S. Southwest. Such terms imply a lack of material or environmental modifications is equivalent to non-existence. Archaeologists have spent much time attempting to construct diagnostic material check-lists suggesting Ndee landscape presence but often miss the critical ongoing associations Ndee communities have to the land beyond material remains. Such associations form understandings of the past, present and future that inform Ndee culture, identity, sovereignty and overall well-being beyond archaeological reasoning. Therefore, what is needed is not only continued collaborative research with Ndee communities, but moving beyond such collaborations defined by western research goals and assumptions. Looking at questions of Indigenous presence and applying Indigenous methodologies can help archaeologists better understand how the past defines the present. Moreover, restrictive archaeological recording categories and terminologies often perpetuate one-sided and stereotypical understandings of Ndee culture and history. This chapter attempts to highlight examples of contemporary Ndee lived experiences in reference to ongoing visibility over time despite restrictions imp…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among some Ndee communities, cultural heritage resources were and are partly managed through avoidance; villages were cleaned up when leaving, camouflaging settlements to prevent detection by US settlers and their military.
“Among some Ndee communities, cultural heritage resources were and are partly managed through avoidance; villages were cleaned up when leaving, camouflaging settlements to prevent detection by impinging US settlers and their genocidal military (and, later, their archaeologists' surveys;Laluk, 2022, 75).”
From Archaeology in 2022: Counter‐myths for hopeful futures (2024) · cites this paper as Laluk, 2022, 75
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Archaeology in 2022: Counter‐myths for hopeful futures
Collective, B. T., Berihuete‐Azorín, M., Blackmore, C., Borck, L., Flexner, J. L., Frieman, C. J., Herrmann, C. A., & Kiddey, R. (2024) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13940 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- LALUK, N. C.
- Venue
- Archaeologies of Indigenous Presence
- Publisher
- University Press of Florida
- Published
- 2022-02-15
- Pages
- 70-88
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review