The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Typological and chronological consideration of the ceramics at Bat, Oman.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hafit-period communities in southeastern Arabia appear to not have used fired pottery in domestic settings despite being in contact with ceramic-producing groups and having knowledge of complex pyrotechnologies.
“Hafit-period communities in southeastern Arabia appear to not have used fired pottery in domestic settings despite being in contact with ceramic-producing groups and having knowledge of complex pyrotechnologies utilised in copper production and softstone bead production [15,20].”
From Identifying pastoral and plant products in local and imported pottery in Early Bronze Age southeastern Arabia (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Early locally-produced pottery in southeastern Arabia appears to be influenced by ceramic technologies from the Indo-Iranian borderlands.
“Early locally-produced pottery in southeastern Arabia appears to be influenced by ceramic technologies from the Indo-Iranian borderlands [15–20].”
From Identifying pastoral and plant products in local and imported pottery in Early Bronze Age southeastern Arabia (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Pottery technology in southeastern Arabia was adopted at a relatively fast pace during the early-mid third millennium BC, within the context of other pyrotechnologies, such as metalworking, as well as the movement of imported pottery and possibly craftspeople from the Indo-Iranian region and Mesopotamia.
“Pottery technology in southeastern Arabia was adopted at a relatively fast pace during the early-mid third millennium BC, within the context of other pyrotechnologies, such as metalworking, as well as the movement of imported pottery and possibly craftspeople from the Indo-Iranian region and Mesopotamia [16–20,150].”
From Identifying pastoral and plant products in local and imported pottery in Early Bronze Age southeastern Arabia (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Suryanarayan, A., Méry, S., Swerida, J., Esposti, M. D., Dollarhide, E., Döpper, S., Douglas, K. A., Eddisford, D., Al-Jahwari, N. S., Mazuy, A., et al. (2025) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0324661 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Thornton, C. P., & Ghazal, R. O.
- Venue
- The Bronze Age Towers at Bat, Sultanate of Oman
- Publisher
- University of Pennsylvania Museum
- Published
- 2016-11-17
- Pages
- 179-216
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
