Cited by 141Mathematics Education and PedagogyHistory and Theory of MathematicsProblem Solving Skills Development

How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method

POLYA, G.·2014·Princeton University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctvc773pk

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TTRL approach-systematically generating and solving related, often simpler, problem variants to build towards a solution for a complex target problem-is inspired by a core tenet of human mathematical problem solving, as described by Polya.

    “Indeed, this TTRL approach—systematically generating and solving related, often simpler, problem variants to build towards a solution for a complex target problem—is inspired by a core tenet of human mathematical problem solving, as notably described by Polya75.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
POLYA, G.
Venue
Princeton University Press eBooks
Published
2014-10-26
OpenAlex
W4229814857
Cited by
140
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.29
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Princeton University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › History and Theory of Mathematics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Problem Solving Skills Development
Keywords
problem solving, mathematical problem solving, mathematical thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review