The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microfossils characterization from south Andean economic plants
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Phytolith and starch grain analysis of samples from a ceramic vessel and a conana identified taxa including Zea mays, Cactaceae, Arecaceae, Fabaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Bixa orellana, and Anadenanthera colubrina.
“phytoliths and starch grains present in the samples from the ceramic vessel (A-G) and the conana (H-Q): (A) Globular with perforation, aff.Cactaceae cf.Opuntia sp. according to Korstanje and Babot (2007).(B) Echinate globular, aff.Arecaceae.(C) Circular phytolith of pooid affinity, sooty or heat-altered.(D) Faceted, hollow phytolith related to Fabaceae.(E, G) Cruciform phytoliths, cf.Zea mays.(F)”
From Reconstructing pre-columbian agrarian territorialities in the el alto-ancasti mountain range, eastern NW argentina (2025) · cites this paper as Korstanje and Babot (2007)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mader, C., Godde, P., Behl, M., Binder, C., Hägele, E., Isla, J., Leceta, F., Lyons, M., Marsh, E., Odenthal, R., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.3389/fearc.2024.1328315 · Cited by 18
Gastaldi, M. R., Zuccarelli Freire, V. N., Gheco, L., Meléndez, A. S., Ferreyra, S., Boscatto, S., Egea, D., Rodríguez Oviedo, M., Nagel, A., Quesada, M. N., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.3389/fearc.2025.1679633 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Korstanje, M. A., & Babot, M. P.
- Venue
- Plants, People and Places
- Publisher
- Oxbow Books
- Published
- 2007-02-01
- Pages
- 41-72
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
