Why Choose the Liberal Arts?
Abstract
A wise and inspiring meditation on the value of an education in the liberal arts, one that is informed by long experience, enriched by mature reflection, and not neglectful of commonsense practicalities. It beckons as a kindly light amid the encircling gloom of so much contemporary commentary on American higher education. --Francis Oakley, President Emeritus, Williams College a resistant country in a resistant age, Mark Roche dares to make the case for education in the liberal in terms both broad and deep. He makes forcefully the obligatory case for the practical value of a liberal education as a preparation for whatever profession--a case that must continue to be made, especially in these times. But on the basis of wide reading and long experience as a scholar, teacher, and administrator in institutions large and small, he straightforwardly makes the case for the inherent value of study in the liberal and for the intimate relationship between that study and what life might actually be about. He foregrounds the truly big questions that are so often avoided in pursuit of the professional by both students and faculty. Unlike so many commentators, he is not a scold. He is a thoughtful advocate for an education in which young and old alike explore together what it means to be a human being and how one might be a better one. --Don Michael Randel, President, The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation I love this book. Mark Roche lays out a fascinating and accurate case for the liberal arts. -…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditional liberal arts colleges tend to not offer professional, vocational, or applied majors, including STEM majors such as engineering.
“Although traditional liberal arts colleges tend to not offer professional, vocational, or applied majors (including STEM majors such as engineering; Roche, 2010)”
From A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness (2021) · cites this paper as Roche, 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness
Bradford, B. C., Beier, M. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-03-0046 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- ROCHE, M. W.
- Corresponding author
- ROCHE, MARK WILLIAM
- Venue
- University of Notre Dame Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Notre Dame Press
- Published
- 2010-08-20
- OpenAlex
- W647886080
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Notre Dame Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
- Social Sciences › Education › University Challenges and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Studies: Technology, Society, and Humanities
- Keywords
- liberal arts education, intellectual virtues, personality development, vocation, higher purpose, United States higher education, professional preparation, meaning of life, liberal arts curriculum, student and parent perspectives, higher education reform, moral education, citizen participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review