Cited by 0Colonialism, slavery, and tradeHistorical Economic and Social StudiesIndigenous Cultures and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Early Seventeenth-Century Trade in Southern New England

McBride, Kevin A.·2021·Dutch and Indigenous Communities in Seventeenth-Century Northeastern North America

Abstract

This chapter examines the nature, mechanics, and material culture of the trade between the Pequot, Dutch, and English between ca. 1611 and June 1637. The beginning date correlates with the arrival of Dutch explorers and traders in Long Island Sound, and the later date corresponds to the defeat of the Pequot in the Pequot War of 1636–37, when they fled their homeland shortly after the Battles of Mistick Fort and the English Withdrawal on May 26, 1637. The data used in this analysis is drawn from Dutch and English historical sources dating between 1611 and 1637 and archaeological data

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/jj.18253463.11

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
McBride, K. A.
Corresponding author
McBride, Kevin A.
Venue
Dutch and Indigenous Communities in Seventeenth-Century Northeastern North America
Published
2021-05-01
Pages
171-214
OpenAlex
W4392571349
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
State University of New York Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
southern New England, colonial trade, trade networks, colonial New England

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review