Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of Undirected Phylogenetic Trees Based on Subtrees of Four Evolutionary Units

Estabrook, G. F., McMorris, F. R., Meacham, C. A.·1985·Systematic Biology

Abstract

A method to measure how similar are two phylogenetic trees for the same collection of evolutionary units (EUs) is described. The measure does not change with changes in the direction of evolution in either of the two trees being compared, and thus it depends only on the convexity and proximity of the groups of EUs within the collection under study. It can also be used with only partially resolved phylogenetic trees. The measure is based on the idea that a group of four EUs is the smallest group for which there is more than one possible distinct undirected phylogenetic tree. For a given phylogenetic tree, the undirected subtree inherited by a group of four EUs is the tree that results when all the branches containing only EUs not in this group of four are removed. Every group of four EUs either inherits one of three distinct types of undirected phylogenetic trees, or is unresolved. Two phylogenetic trees can be com- pared on the basis of which groups of four EUs inherit the same type of undirected phylogenetic tree. The ideas can be extended to comparisons of three or more trees. (Phylogenetic trees; compatibility; subtree.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/sysbio/34.2.193

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Estabrook, G. F., McMorris, F. R., & Meacham, C. A.
Venue
Systematic Biology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1985-06-01
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
193-200
ISSN
  • 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1076-836X
OpenAlex
W1977694535
Cited by
253
References
0
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Undirected Phylogenetic Trees Based on Subtrees of Four Evolutionary Units. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/sysbio/34.2.193
The paper
Estabrook, G. F., McMorris, F. R., & Meacham, C. A. (1985). Comparison of Undirected Phylogenetic Trees Based on Subtrees of Four Evolutionary Units. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.2307/sysbio/34.2.193

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.