The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing Knowledge Sharing in Public Accounting Firms
Abstract
The goal of this study is to advance understanding of factors that may enhance or hinder knowledge sharing in public accounting firms and, in the end, provide practical recommendations for the firms. Attention to this topic is warranted for two reasons. First, today's regulatory environment and new auditing standards have broadened and intensified pressures on CPA firms to enhance the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of the audit process. Second, knowledge and expertise are unevenly distributed among the members of the audit team. Thus, knowledge sharing can help CPA firms in leveraging the skills, knowledge, and best practices of their professional staff. Against this background, CPA firms' ability to effectively deploy knowledgesharing activities is increasingly vital to their competitive advantage, including gaining tangible benefits in terms of time and cost reductions. We draw upon prior research in accounting, organizational learning, psychology, and knowledge management to examine the role of three factors–information technology, formal and informal interactions among auditors, and reward systems–in encouraging knowledge sharing. We develop recommendations for public accounting firms and suggest several directions for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Miller, K. A., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2070638 · Cited by 15,312
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,062
The Knowledge-Creating Company
Nonaka, I. (1998) · The Economic Impact of Knowledge · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7009-8.50016-1 · Cited by 14,619
POLANYI, M. (1997) · Knowledge in Organisations · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-x · Cited by 12,408
Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5167 · Cited by 10,802
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250961 · Cited by 10,176
Cited by
Auditor Style and Financial Statement Comparability
Francis, J. R., Pinnuck, M., & Watanabe, O. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2287631 · Cited by 369
Office Size of Big 4 Auditors and Client Restatements
Francis, J. R., Michas, P. N., & Yu, M. D. (2013) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12011 · Cited by 357
Elbashir, M. Z., Collier, P. A., & Sutton, S. G. (2011) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.00000010 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Vera-Mun˜oz, S. C., Ho, J. L., & Chow, C. W.
- Venue
- Accounting Horizons
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2006-06-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-155
- ISSN
- 0888-7993 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7975
- OpenAlex
- W2171407774
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 95
- FWCI
- 36.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing Knowledge Sharing in Public Accounting Firms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/acch.2006.20.2.133
- The paper
- Vera-Mun˜oz, S. C., Ho, J. L., & Chow, C. W. (2006). Enhancing Knowledge Sharing in Public Accounting Firms. Accounting Horizons. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2006.20.2.133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.