The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Case Study Research in Accounting
Abstract
SYNOPSIS: We describe case study research and explain its value for developing theory and informing practice. While recognizing the complementary nature of many research methods, we stress the benefits of case studies for understanding situations of uncertainty, instability, uniqueness, and value conflict. We introduce the concept of phronesis—the analysis of what actions are practical and rational in a specific context—and indicate the value of case studies for developing, and reflecting on, professional knowledge. Examples of case study research in managerial accounting, auditing, and financial accounting illustrate the strengths of case studies for theory development and their potential for generating new knowledge. We conclude by disputing common misconceptions about case study research and suggesting how barriers to case study research may be overcome, which we believe is an important step in making accounting research more relevant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Business planning as pedagogy: Language and control in a changing institutional field
Oakes, L. S., Townley, B., & Cooper, D. J. (1998) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393853 · Cited by 675
Self-citation
Cited by
Is Environmental Governance Substantive or Symbolic? An Empirical Investigation
Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M., & Cho, C. H. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1331-5 · Cited by 434
A systematic qualitative case study: questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation
Alam, M. K. (2020) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qrom-09-2019-1825 · Cited by 382
The Case of Sustainability Assurance: Constructing a New Assurance Service *
O’Dwyer, B. (2011) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01108.x · Cited by 321
Qualitative Research in Auditing: A Methodological Roadmap
Power, M. K., & Gendron, Y. (2015) · AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-10423 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, D. J., & Morgan, W.
- Venue
- Accounting Horizons
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2008-06-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-178
- ISSN
- 0888-7993 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7975
- OpenAlex
- W1979238474
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 23.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Case Study Research in Accounting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/acch.2008.22.2.159
- The paper
- Cooper, D. J., & Morgan, W. (2008). Case Study Research in Accounting. Accounting Horizons. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2008.22.2.159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.