The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investor Sophistication and Patterns in Stock Returns after Earnings Announcements
Open accessAbstract
This study tests whether the observed patterns in stock returns after quarterly earnings announcements are related to the proportion of firm shares held by institutional investors, a variable used by prior research to proxy for investor sophistication. Our findings show that the institutional holdings variable is negatively correlated with the observed post-announcement abnormal returns. Our findings also show that traditional proxies for transaction costs (i.e., trading volume, stock price) as well as firm size have little incremental power to explain post-announcement abnormal returns when institutional holdings is an explanatory variable. If institutional ownership is a valid proxy for investor sophistication, these findings suggest that the trading activity of unsophisticated investors underlies the predictability of stock returns after earnings announcements. However, tests evaluating the validity of institutional holdings as a proxy for investor sophistication yield only mixed results. This calls for caution in interpreting our findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
Cited by
Just how much do individual investors lose by trading?
Barber, B. M., Lee, Y.-T., Liu, Y.-J., & Odean, T. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn046 · Cited by 953
Griffin, J. M., Kelly, P. J., & Nardari, F. (2010) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhq044 · Cited by 556
Arbitrage risk and the book-to-market anomaly
Ali, A., Hwang, L.-S., & Trombley, M. A. (2003) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-405x(03)00116-8 · Cited by 518
The cost of financial flexibility: Evidence from share repurchases
Bonaimé, A. A., Hankins, K. W., & Jordan, B. D. (2016) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.002 · Cited by 68
Chung, C. Y., Lee, J., & Park, J. (2014) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.1111/ajfs.12043 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartov, E., Radhakrishnan, S., & Krinsky, I.
- Venue
- The Accounting Review
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-63
- ISSN
- 0001-4826 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7967
- OpenAlex
- W2030896546
- Cited by
- 745
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
