The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Earnings Informativeness and Strategic Disclosure: An Empirical Examination of “Pro Forma” Earnings
Open accessAbstract
This paper provides evidence on the characteristics of firms that include “pro forma” earnings information in their press releases, whether the usefulness of pro forma earnings to investors varies systematically with these characteristics, and whether the investor response to pro forma earnings is consistent with market efficiency or mispricing. Using a sample of 249 press releases from 1997–99, we find that firms with low GAAP earnings informativeness are more likely to disclose pro forma earnings than other firms. We also find that strategic considerations, measured using the direction of GAAP earnings surprises, are an important determinant of pro forma reporting. In addition, our examination of the relative and incremental information content of pro forma earnings shows that investors find pro forma earnings to be more useful when GAAP earnings informativeness is low or when strategic considerations are absent. Tests of the predictive ability of pro forma earnings for future profitability and returns are mixed, and we therefore cannot conclusively determine whether the investor reaction to pro forma earnings at the time of the press release is consistent with market efficiency or mispricing. The paper contributes to the growing literature on pro forma earnings and more generally to the literature on voluntary and strategic disclosure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determinants of corporate borrowing
Myers, S. C. (1977) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(77)90015-0 · Cited by 13,169
Cited by
The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature
Beyer, A., Cohen, D. A., Lys, T. Z., & Walther, B. R. (2010) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.003 · Cited by 2,609
Are Investors Influenced By How Earnings Press Releases Are Written?
Henry, E. (2008) · Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/0021943608319388 · Cited by 893
Disclosure Tone and Shareholder Litigation
Rogers, J. L., Van Buskirk, A., & Zechman, S. L. C. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1331608 · Cited by 592
Do Firms Strategically Disseminate? Evidence from Corporate Use of Social Media
Jung, M. J., Naughton, J. P., Tahoun, A., & Wang, C. (2018) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-51906 · Cited by 380
Are Investors Influenced by Pro Forma Emphasis and Reconciliations in Earnings Announcements?
Elliott, W. B. (2006) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2006.81.1.113 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Lougee, B. A., & Marquardt, C. A.
- Venue
- The Accounting Review
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 769-795
- ISSN
- 0001-4826 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7967
- OpenAlex
- W2045271182
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 73.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Earnings Informativeness and Strategic Disclosure: An Empirical Examination of “Pro Forma” Earnings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/accr.2004.79.3.769
- The paper
- Lougee, B. A., & Marquardt, C. A. (2004). Earnings Informativeness and Strategic Disclosure: An Empirical Examination of “Pro Forma” Earnings. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.3.769
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.