The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Accrual Anomaly: International Evidence
Abstract
We consider stock markets in 20 countries to investigate whether the accrual anomaly (Sloan 1996), characterized by U.S. stock prices overweighting the role of accrual persistence, is a local manifestation of a global phenomenon.We explore whether the occurrence of the anomaly is related to country differences in accounting and institutional structures, and examine alternative explanations for its occurrence. We find stock prices overweight accruals in general, with accruals overweighting occurring in countries with a common law relative to a code law tradition. Using firmlevel data on a country-by-country basis, we document the occurrence of the anomaly in four countries, Australia, Canada, the U.K., and the U.S., and also in a sample of American Depository Receipts (ADRs) of firms domiciled in countries where we do not detect the anomaly. Using country-level data, we confirm the anomaly is more likely to occur in countries having a common law tradition, and also in countries allowing extensive use of accrual accounting and having a lower concentration of share ownership. Additional analyses reveal that earnings management and barriers to arbitrage best explain the anomaly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250042 · Cited by 18,025
Legal Determinants of External Finance
LA PORTA, R., LOPEZ‐DE‐SILANES, F., SHLEIFER, A., & VISHNY, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02727.x · Cited by 9,783
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
Cited by
Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle
STAMBAUGH, R. F., YU, J., & YUAN, Y. (2015) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12286 · Cited by 940
IFRS Adoption and Accounting Quality: A Review
Soderstrom, N. S., & Sun, K. J. (2007) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180701706732 · Cited by 913
Arbitrage Asymmetry and the Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle
Stambaugh, R. F., Yu, J., & Yuan, Y. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2155491 · Cited by 286
The Accrual Anomaly: Risk or Mispricing?
Hirshleifer, D., Hou, K., & Teoh, S. H. (2012) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1289 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Pincus, M., Rajgopal, S., & Venkatachalam, M.
- Venue
- The Accounting Review
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2007-01-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-203
- ISSN
- 0001-4826 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7967
- OpenAlex
- W3122697520
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 40.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Accrual Anomaly: International Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/accr.2007.82.1.169
- The paper
- Pincus, M., Rajgopal, S., & Venkatachalam, M. (2007). The Accrual Anomaly: International Evidence. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.1.169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.