The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Artificial Neural Network Modeling for Deciding if Extractions Are Necessary Prior to Orthodontic Treatment
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To construct a decision-making expert system (ES) for the orthodontic treatment of patients between 11 and 15 years old to determine whether extraction is needed by using artificial neural networks (ANN). Specifically, we will uncover the factors that affect this decision-making process. Methods: A total of 200 subjects were chosen; among them, 120 were accepted for extraction treatments, and 80 were chosen for nonextraction treatments. For each case, 23 indices were selected. A 23-13-1 Back Propagation (BP) ANN model was constructed, and the data for 180 patients were aggregated to constitute the training set. Data for the other 20 patients were used as the testing set. Results: When data from the 180 patients that had been trained were tested, the result was 100%, as expected. The untrained data from 20 patients in the testing set were 80% correct (ie, 16 cases were forecasted successfully). In the meantime, the relative contributions of the 23 input indices to the final output index (extraction/nonextraction) were calculated. “Anterior teeth uncovered by incompetent lips” and “IMPA (L1-MP)” were the two indices that gave the biggest contributions sequentially; the index of FMA (FH-MP) gave the smallest contribution. Conclusions: (1) The constructed artificial neural network in this study was effective, with 80% accuracy, in determining whether extraction or nonextraction treatment was best for malocclusion patients between 11 and 15 years old; (2) when the clinician is predicting whether an orthodontic treatment requires extraction, the indices “anterior teeth uncovered by incompetent lips” and “IMPA (L1-MP)” should be taken into consideration first.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Artificial intelligence in dentistry-a review
Ding, H., Wu, J., Zhao, W., Matinlinna, J. P., Burrow, M. F., & Tsoi, J. K. H. (2023) · Frontiers in Dental Medicine · doi:10.3389/fdmed.2023.1085251 · Cited by 297
New approach for the diagnosis of extractions with neural network machine learning
Jung, S.-K., & Kim, T.-W. (2016) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.030 · Cited by 266
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Dental Medicine: A Critical Review
Sitaras, S., Tsolakis, I. A., Gelsini, M., Tsolakis, A. I., Schwendicke, F., Wolf, T. G., & Perlea, P. (2025) · International Dental Journal · doi:10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.009 · Cited by 42
Lin, L., Tang, B., Cao, L., Yan, J., Zhao, T., Hua, F., & He, H. (2023) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.07.006 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, X., Wang, L., & Wang, A.
- Venue
- The Angle Orthodontist
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 262-266
- ISSN
- 0003-3219 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7103
- OpenAlex
- W2143950899
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial Neural Network Modeling for Deciding if Extractions Are Necessary Prior to Orthodontic Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2319/111608-588.1
- The paper
- Xie, X., Wang, L., & Wang, A. (2010). Artificial Neural Network Modeling for Deciding if Extractions Are Necessary Prior to Orthodontic Treatment. The Angle Orthodontist. https://doi.org/10.2319/111608-588.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.