Cited by 26Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsDental Radiography and ImagingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The knowledge, experience, and attitude on artificial intelligence-assisted cephalometric analysis: Survey of orthodontists and orthodontic students

Open access
Lin, Lizhuo, Tang, Bojun, Cao, Lingyun, Yan, Jiarong, Zhao, Tingting, Hua, Fang, He, Hong·2023·American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Abstract

Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) developed rapidly in orthodontics, and AI-based cephalometric applications have been adopted. This study aimed to assess AI-assisted cephalometric technologies related knowledge, experience, and attitude among orthodontists and orthodontic students; describe their subject view of the applications and related technologies in orthodontics; and identify associated factors. Methods An online cross-sectional survey based on a professional tool (www.wjx.cn) was performed from October 11-17, 2022. Participants were recruited with a purposive and snowball sampling approach. Data was collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable generalized estimating equations. Results Four hundred eighty valid questionnaires were collected and analyzed; 68.8% of the respondents agreed that AI-based cephalometric applications would replace manual and semiautomatic approaches. Practitioners using AI-assisted applications (87.5%) spent less time in cephalometric analysis than the other groups using other approaches, and 349 (72.7%) respondents considered AI-based applications could assist in obtaining more accurate analysis results. Lectures and training programs (56.0%) were the main sources of respondents' knowledge about AI. Knowledge level was associated with experience in AI-related clinical or scientific projects (P <0.001). Most respondents (88.8%) were interested in future AI applications in orthodontics. Conclusions Respondents are optimistic about the future of AI in orthodontics. AI-assisted cephalometric applications were believed to make clinical diagnostic analysis more convenient and straightforward for practitioners and even replace manual and semiautomatic approaches. The education and promotion of AI should be strengthened to elevate orthodontists' understanding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.07.006

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, L., Tang, B., Cao, L., Yan, J., Zhao, T., Hua, F., & He, H.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Hua, Fang
  • He, Hong
Venue
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
164
Issue
4
Pages
e97-e105
ISSN
0889-5406 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385689613
Cited by
26
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wuhan University (2021ZG328)
  • Chinese Stomatological Association (COS-B2021-08)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, orthodontists, knowledge and attitudes, clinical experience, artificial intelligence adoption, orthodontic education
MeSH terms
Orthodontists, Artificial Intelligence, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review