Cited by 80High-Temperature Coating BehaviorsHigh-Velocity Impact and Material BehaviorFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Simulation of Solid Particle Impact Behavior for Spray Processes

Open access
Yokoyama, Kensuke, Watanabe, Makoto, Kuroda, Seiji, Gotoh, Yoshihiko, Schmidt, Tobias, Gärtner, Frank·2006·MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS

Abstract

Several thermal spray processes developed recently are characterized by relatively low temperature and higher velocity of sprayed particles. They include cold spray, high velocity oxy-fuel spray, and warm spray, in which majority or all the sprayed particles are in solid phase when impinging onto the substrate surface. Therefore, in order to understand the coating formation process of such processes, detailed knowledge concerning impact phenomena of a solid particle is essential. It is generally accepted that there exists a minimum velocity beyond which a particle adheres to the substrate and this velocity is called the “critical velocity”. How the critical velocity depends on various materials and process variables is not fully understood yet. In this study, analysis of a metal particle impacting onto a metal substrate was carried out by using a dynamic finite element code (ABAQUS). Effects of a substrate and a particle temperature on the critical velocity were numerically studied. Also, effects of thermal conduction on the simulation results were discussed. It was found that critical velocity decreases with 1) higher stiffness of the substrate, 2) higher particles temperature, and 3) greater particle size.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2320/matertrans.47.1697

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For every 100 °C increase in temperature, the particle critical velocity decreases by about 16 m/s.

    “According to a previous study, for every 100 °C increase in temperature, the particle critical velocity decreases by about 16 m/s.[48].”

    From Cold Spray Process for Co-Deposition of Copper and Aluminum Particles (2023) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Results and Discussions section (Fig. 8) says that increasing a copper particle’s initial temperature decreases critical velocity in the adiabatic simulation. It does not state a decrease of about 16 m/s per 100 °C, and it reports different critical velocities for copper and carbon-steel substrates. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. 1) S. Kuroda: Proc. 15th Int. Therm. Spray Conf. (1998), 539–550. · DOI
  2. 2) S. V. Klinkov, V. F. Kosarev and M. Rein: Aerospace Sci. Tech. 9 (2005) 582–591. · DOI
  3. 3) J. Kawakita, T. Fukushima, S. Kuroda, H. Katanoda, K. Matsuo and H. Fukanuma: Proc. Int. Therm. Spray Conf. (2005) 705–708. · DOI
  4. 4) H. Assadi, F. Gärtner, T. Stolenhoff and H. Kreye: Acta Mater. 51 (2003) 4379–4394. · DOI · Paper page
  5. 5) A. P. Alkhimov, A. I. Gudilov, V. F. Kosarev and N. I. Nesterovich: J. Appl. Mech. and Tech. Phys. 41 (2000) 188–192. · DOI
  6. 6) C. J. Li, W. Y. Li, Y. Y. Wang, G. J. Yang and H. Fukanuma: Thin solid film. 489 (2005) 79–85. · DOI
  7. 7) C. Borchers, F. Gärtner, T. Stoltenhoff, H. Assadi and H. Kreye: J. Appl. Phys. 93 (2003) 10064–10070. · DOI
  8. 8) T. Schmidt, F. Gärtner, H. Assadi and H. Kreye: Acta Mater. 54 (2006) 729–742. · DOI · Paper page
  9. 9) D. L. Gilmore, R. C. Dykhuizen, R. A. Neiser, T. J. Roemer and M. F. Smith: J. Therm. Spray Tech. 8 (1999) 576–582. · DOI
  10. 12) ASM International Handbook, vol. 8, mechanical testing and evaluation (Materials Park, Ohio 2000).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yokoyama, K., Watanabe, M., Kuroda, S., Gotoh, Y., Schmidt, T., & Gärtner, F.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo University of Science (JP)
  • National Institute for Materials Science (JP)
  • Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
  • Helmut Schmidt University
Venue
MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS
Published
2006
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
1697-1702
ISSN
  • 1345-9678 (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-5320
OpenAlex
W1973925318
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
12.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Keywords
solid particle impact, critical speed, cold spray, substrate stiffness, particle temperature, heat conduction, particle size effects, dynamic finite element simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review