Key Technology Development for Future Lunar Utilization— Block Production Using Lunar Regolith
Open accessAbstract
For initial human activity on the lunar surface, many kinds of supplies will have to be carried from the Earth.Most of the cost of exploring the lunar surface relates to carrying a payload from the Earth to the Moon.Therefore, the authors expect that in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) will be an important key technology.As the first step of ISRU technology demonstration, we produced blocks without any additive materials other than lunar regolith simulant through sintering.In the experiment, to find the best conditions for block production, test pieces were sintered under various conditions such as temperature and holding time.After sintering, a visual inspection and a breaking-strength test were performed.The results of experiments showed that it was possible not only to make large blocks and but also to produce blocks with fine structures by sintering using an appropriate temperature-time profile.It was also confirmed that the blocks had sufficient strength for construction, and the compressive and bending strength are comparable to those of typical concrete blocks used in terrestrial construction.Such blocks are expected to be used as construction materials and radiation shielding at a human outpost.This paper details our technological developments relating to block production from lunar regolith that will enable future lunar surface activities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Large sintered FJS-1 blocks (100 mm × 100 mm × 50 mm) showed many cracks and crazing, showing that the time-temperature profile of small blocks was unsuitable for larger parts.
“Large blocks showed many cracks and crazing, showing that the time-temperature profile of the small blocks was unsuitable for larger parts.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [320]
Sintered FJS-1 blocks showed compressive and bending strength of 30 MPa and 5 MPa, respectively, which is in the range of typical concrete on Earth.
“Blocks showed compressive and bending strength of 30 MPa and 5 MPa, respectively, which is in the range of the typical concrete on the Earth.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [320]
Results showed the importance of heating rate over holding time in larger parts.
“Results showed the importance of heating rate over holding time in larger parts.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [320]
The necessary sintering temperature to achieve the same strength in a vacuum environment was around 100 K lower compared to that required under atmospheric conditions for FJS-1 blocks.
“the findings from sintering blocks measuring 60 mm in diameter and 50 mm in thickness, conducted under both vacuum and ambient air, demonstrated that the necessary sintering temperature to achieve the same strength in a vacuum environment was around 100 K lower compared to that required under atmospheric conditions.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [320]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Farries, K. W., Visintin, P., Smith, S. T., & van Eyk, P. (2021) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123627 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Mechanical behaviour of additively manufactured lunar regolith simulant components
Goulas, A., Binner, J. G., Engstrøm, D. S., Harris, R. A., & Friel, R. J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications · doi:10.1177/1464420718777932 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction
Azami, M., Kazemi, Z., Moazen, S., Dubé, M., Potvin, M.-J., & Skonieczny, K. (2024) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.101045 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Wan, F., Zuo, Y., Pan, Y., Yu, A., Qi, J., & Lu, X. (2024) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137395 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- HOSHINO, T., WAKABAYASHI, S., YOSHIHARA, S., & HATANAKA, N.
- Affiliations
- Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
- Japan Manned Space Systems Corporation (Japan) (JP)
- Venue
- TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES, AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY JAPAN
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- ists30
- Pages
- Pk_35-Pk_40
- ISSN
- 1884-0485 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2549461886
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY JAPAN (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
- Keywords
- lunar regolith, in-situ resource utilization, sintering, lunar regolith simulant, compressive strength, flexural strength, radiation shielding, lunar base, lunar surface exploration, time-temperature profiles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review