Cited by 3Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 Abridged for Primary Care

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/cd25-aint

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
American Diabetes Association Primary Care Advisory Group, ElSayed, N., Baig, A., Balapattabi, K., Bradley, S., Capelson, R., D’Souza, J., Gonzalez, J., Haynes, A., Kim, M., Miller, K., Pekas, E., Pfotenhauer, K., Rapalo, D., Smith, A., Tseng, E., Venkataramani, M., Webb, H., & Bannuru, R.
Venue
Clinical Diabetes
Published
2025-04-01
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
182-182
ISSN
  • 0891-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-4953
OpenAlex
W4409061368
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
American Diabetes Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
diabetes care standards, primary care, diabetes management, glycemic control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review