The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intensive Insulin Therapy in Mixed Medical/Surgical Intensive Care Units
Abstract
Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) improves the outcome of prolonged critically ill patients, but concerns remain regarding potential harm and the optimal blood glucose level. These questions were addressed using the pooled dataset of two randomized controlled trials. Independent of parenteral glucose load, IIT reduced mortality from 23.6 to 20.4% in the intention-to-treat group (n = 2,748; P = 0.04) and from 37.9 to 30.1% among long stayers (n = 1,389; P = 0.002), with no difference among short stayers (8.9 vs. 10.4%; n = 1,359; P = 0.4). Compared with blood glucose of 110–150 mg/dl, mortality was higher with blood glucose >150 mg/dl (odds ratio 1.38 [95% CI 1.10–1.75]; P = 0.007) and lower with <110 mg/dl (0.77 [0.61–0.96]; P = 0.02). Only patients with diabetes (n = 407) showed no survival benefit of IIT. Prevention of kidney injury and critical illness polyneuropathy required blood glucose strictly <110 mg/day, but this level carried the highest risk of hypoglycemia. Within 24 h of hypoglycemia, three patients in the conventional and one in the IIT group died (P = 0.0004) without difference in hospital mortality. No new neurological problems occurred in survivors who experienced hypoglycemia in intensive care units (ICUs). We conclude that IIT reduces mortality of all medical/surgical ICU patients, except those with a prior history of diabetes, and does not cause harm. A blood glucose target <110 mg/day was most effective but also carried the highest risk of hypoglycemia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU
Van den Berghe, G., Wilmer, A., Hermans, G., Meersseman, W., Wouters, P. J., Milants, I., Van Wijngaerden, E., Bobbaers, H., & Bouillon, R. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052521 · Cited by 3,639
Self-citation
Cited by
Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients
(2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810625 · Cited by 5,119
ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: intensive care
Singer, P., Berger, M. M., Van den Berghe, G., Biolo, G., Calder, P., Forbes, A., Griffiths, R., Kreyman, G., Leverve, X., & Pichard, C. (2009) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2009.04.024 · Cited by 1,907
Dungan, K. M., Braithwaite, S. S., & Preiser, J.-C. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60553-5 · Cited by 1,431
Hyperglycemia-related mortality in critically ill patients varies with admission diagnosis
Falciglia, M., Freyberg, R. W., Almenoff, P. L., D’Alessio, D. A., & Render, M. L. (2009) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181b083f7 · Cited by 576
Vlasselaers, D., Milants, I., Desmet, L., Wouters, P. J., Vanhorebeek, I., van den Heuvel, I., Mesotten, D., Casaer, M. P., Meyfroidt, G., Ingels, C., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60044-1 · Cited by 554
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Van den Berghe, G., Wilmer, A., Milants, I., Wouters, P. J., Bouckaert, B., Bruyninckx, F., Bouillon, R., & Schetz, M.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2006-11-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3151-3159
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2183831387
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 45.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intensive Insulin Therapy in Mixed Medical/Surgical Intensive Care Units. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/db06-0855
- The paper
- Van den Berghe, G., Wilmer, A., Milants, I., Wouters, P. J., Bouckaert, B., Bruyninckx, F., Bouillon, R., & Schetz, M. (2006). Intensive Insulin Therapy in Mixed Medical/Surgical Intensive Care Units. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-0855
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.