Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

n-3 Fatty Acids Preserve Insulin Sensitivity In Vivo in a Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-α–Dependent Manner

Open access
Neschen, Susanne, Morino, Katsutaro, Dong, Jianying, Wang-Fischer, Yanlin, Cline, Gary W., Romanelli, Anthony J., Rossbacher, Jörg C., Moore, Irene K., Regittnig, Werner, Munoz, David S., Kim, Jung H., Shulman, Gerald I.·2007·Diabetes

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that n-3 fatty acids, abundant in fish oil, protect against high-fat diet–induced insulin resistance through peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR)-α activation and a subsequent decrease in intracellular lipid abundance. To directly test this hypothesis, we fed PPAR-α null and wild-type mice for 2 weeks with isocaloric high-fat diets containing 27% fat from either safflower oil or safflower oil with an 8% fish oil replacement (fish oil diet). In both genotypes the safflower oil diet blunted insulin-mediated suppression of hepatic glucose production (P < 0.02 vs. genotype control) and PEPCK gene expression. Feeding wild-type mice a fish oil diet restored hepatic insulin sensitivity (hepatic glucose production [HGP], P < 0.002 vs. wild-type mice fed safflower oil), whereas in contrast, in PPAR-α null mice failed to counteract hepatic insulin resistance (HGP, P = NS vs. PPAR-α null safflower oil–fed mice). In PPAR-α null mice fed the fish oil diet, safflower oil plus fish oil, hepatic insulin resistance was dissociated from increases in hepatic triacylglycerol and acyl-CoA but accompanied by a more than threefold increase in hepatic diacylglycerol concentration (P < 0.0001 vs. genotype control). These data support the hypothesis that n-3 fatty acids protect from high-fat diet–induced hepatic insulin resistance in a PPAR-α–and diacylglycerol-dependent manner.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db06-1206

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Neschen, S., Morino, K., Dong, J., Wang-Fischer, Y., Cline, G. W., Romanelli, A. J., Rossbacher, J. C., Moore, I. K., Regittnig, W., Munoz, D. S., Kim, J. H., & Shulman, G. I.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2007-04-01
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
1034-1041
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2113717007
Cited by
233
References
16
FWCI
11.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: n-3 Fatty Acids Preserve Insulin Sensitivity In Vivo in a Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-α–Dependent Manner. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/db06-1206
The paper
Neschen, S., Morino, K., Dong, J., Wang-Fischer, Y., Cline, G. W., Romanelli, A. J., Rossbacher, J. C., Moore, I. K., Regittnig, W., Munoz, D. S., Kim, J. H., & Shulman, G. I. (2007). n-3 Fatty Acids Preserve Insulin Sensitivity In Vivo in a Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor-α–Dependent Manner. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/db06-1206

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.