Cited by 60Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Apolipoprotein B but not LDL Cholesterol Is Associated With Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 2 Diabetic Whites

Open access
Martin, Seth S., Qasim, Atif N., Mehta, Nehal N., Wolfe, Megan, Terembula, Karen, Schwartz, Stanley, Iqbal, Nayyar, Schutta, Mark +2 more·2009·Diabetes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evidence favors apolipoprotein B (apoB) over LDL cholesterol as a predictor of cardiovascular events, but data are lacking on coronary artery calcification (CAC), especially in type 2 diabetes, where LDL cholesterol may underestimate atherosclerotic burden. We investigated the hypothesis that apoB is a superior marker of CAC relative to LDL cholesterol. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed cross-sectional analyses of white subjects in two community-based studies: the Penn Diabetes Heart Study (N = 611 type 2 diabetic subjects, 71.4% men) and the Study of Inherited Risk of Coronary Atherosclerosis (N = 803 nondiabetic subjects, 52.8% men) using multivariate analysis of apoB and LDL cholesterol stratified by diabetes status. RESULTS: In type 2 diabetes, apoB was associated with CAC after adjusting for age, sex, and medications [Tobit regression ratio of increased CAC for 1-SD increase in apoB; 1.36 (95% CI 1.06–1.75), P = 0.016] whereas LDL cholesterol was not [1.09 (0.85–1.41)]. In nondiabetic subjects, both were associated with CAC [apoB 1.65 (1.38–1.96), P < 0.001; LDL cholesterol 1.56 (1.30–1.86), P < 0.001]. In combined analysis of diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, apoB provided value in predicting CAC scores beyond LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, the total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol and triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratios, and marginally beyond non-HDL cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma apoB, but not LDL cholesterol, levels were associated with CAC scores in type 2 diabetic whites. ApoB levels may be particularly useful in assessing atherosclerotic burden and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db08-1794

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The value of non-HDL-C in CVD risk assessment was first proposed by Frost and Havel in 1998, and this relationship has now been confirmed in many studies.

    “The value of non-HDL-C in CVD risk assessment was first proposed by Frost and Havel in 1998, 61 and this relationship has now been confirmed in many studies. [203]3][204][205][206][207][208][209][210][211][212][213][214][215][216]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, S. S., Qasim, A. N., Mehta, N. N., Wolfe, M., Terembula, K., Schwartz, S., Iqbal, N., Schutta, M., Bagheri, R., & Reilly, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • UConn Health (US)
Corresponding author
Reilly, Muredach P.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2009-06-02
Volume
58
Issue
8
Pages
1887-1892
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2118212056
Cited by
60
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL097151, R01HL073278, P50HL083799)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024134)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
apolipoprotein B, LDL cholesterol, coronary artery calcification, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerotic burden, cardiovascular risk, lipid biomarkers, non-HDL cholesterol, triglyceride to HDL cholesterol ratio, TC/HDL-C ratio
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Apolipoproteins B, Calcinosis, Coronary Artery Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Biomarkers, Multivariate Analysis, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review