Apolipoprotein B but not LDL Cholesterol Is Associated With Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 2 Diabetic Whites
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Evidence favors apolipoprotein B (apoB) over LDL cholesterol as a predictor of cardiovascular events, but data are lacking on coronary artery calcification (CAC), especially in type 2 diabetes, where LDL cholesterol may underestimate atherosclerotic burden. We investigated the hypothesis that apoB is a superior marker of CAC relative to LDL cholesterol. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed cross-sectional analyses of white subjects in two community-based studies: the Penn Diabetes Heart Study (N = 611 type 2 diabetic subjects, 71.4% men) and the Study of Inherited Risk of Coronary Atherosclerosis (N = 803 nondiabetic subjects, 52.8% men) using multivariate analysis of apoB and LDL cholesterol stratified by diabetes status. RESULTS: In type 2 diabetes, apoB was associated with CAC after adjusting for age, sex, and medications [Tobit regression ratio of increased CAC for 1-SD increase in apoB; 1.36 (95% CI 1.06–1.75), P = 0.016] whereas LDL cholesterol was not [1.09 (0.85–1.41)]. In nondiabetic subjects, both were associated with CAC [apoB 1.65 (1.38–1.96), P < 0.001; LDL cholesterol 1.56 (1.30–1.86), P < 0.001]. In combined analysis of diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, apoB provided value in predicting CAC scores beyond LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, the total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol and triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratios, and marginally beyond non-HDL cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma apoB, but not LDL cholesterol, levels were associated with CAC scores in type 2 diabetic whites. ApoB levels may be particularly useful in assessing atherosclerotic burden and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The value of non-HDL-C in CVD risk assessment was first proposed by Frost and Havel in 1998, and this relationship has now been confirmed in many studies.
“The value of non-HDL-C in CVD risk assessment was first proposed by Frost and Havel in 1998, 61 and this relationship has now been confirmed in many studies. [203]3][204][205][206][207][208][209][210][211][212][213][214][215][216]”
From Triglycerides and Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2011) · cites this paper as [205]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mora, S., Szklo, M., Otvos, J. D., Greenland, P., Psaty, B. M., Goff, D. C., O’Leary, D. H., Saad, M. F., Tsai, M. Y., & Sharrett, A. R. (2007) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.05.007 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Elkeles, R. S., Godsland, I. F., Feher, M. D., Rubens, M. B., Roughton, M., Nugara, F., Humphries, S. E., Richmond, W., Flather, M. D., & for the PREDICT Study Group (2008) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn279 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
El Harchaoui, K., van der Steeg, W. A., Stroes, E. S. G., Kuivenhoven, J. A., Otvos, J. D., Wareham, N. J., Hutten, B. A., Kastelein, J. J. P., Khaw, K.-T., & Boekholdt, S. M. (2007) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.043 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Triglycerides and Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Miller, M., Stone, N. J., Ballantyne, C., Bittner, V., Criqui, M. H., Ginsberg, H. N., Goldberg, A. C., Howard, W. J., Jacobson, M. S., Kris-Etherton, P. M., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3182160726 · Cited by 1,871 · see citing works
- Authors
- Martin, S. S., Qasim, A. N., Mehta, N. N., Wolfe, M., Terembula, K., Schwartz, S., Iqbal, N., Schutta, M., Bagheri, R., & Reilly, M. P.
- Affiliations
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- UConn Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reilly, Muredach P.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2009-06-02
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1887-1892
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- PMC
- PMC2712798
- OpenAlex
- W2118212056
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Heart Association
- National Institutes of Health
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL097151, R01HL073278, P50HL083799)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024134)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- apolipoprotein B, LDL cholesterol, coronary artery calcification, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerotic burden, cardiovascular risk, lipid biomarkers, non-HDL cholesterol, triglyceride to HDL cholesterol ratio, TC/HDL-C ratio
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Apolipoproteins B, Calcinosis, Coronary Artery Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Biomarkers, Multivariate Analysis, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review