Disordered control of intestinal sweet taste receptor expression and glucose absorption in type 2 diabetes
Open accessAbstract
We previously established that the intestinal sweet taste receptors (STRs), T1R2 and T1R3, were expressed in distinct epithelial cells in the human proximal intestine and that their transcript levels varied with glycemic status in patients with type 2 diabetes. Here we determined whether STR expression was 1) acutely regulated by changes in luminal and systemic glucose levels, 2) disordered in type 2 diabetes, and 3) linked to glucose absorption. Fourteen healthy subjects and 13 patients with type 2 diabetes were studied twice, at euglycemia (5.2 ± 0.2 mmol/L) or hyperglycemia (12.3 ± 0.2 mmol/L). Endoscopic biopsy specimens were collected from the duodenum at baseline and after a 30-min intraduodenal glucose infusion of 30 g/150 mL water plus 3 g 3-O-methylglucose (3-OMG). STR transcripts were quantified by RT-PCR, and plasma was assayed for 3-OMG concentration. Intestinal STR transcript levels at baseline were unaffected by acute variations in glycemia in healthy subjects and in type 2 diabetic patients. T1R2 transcript levels increased after luminal glucose infusion in both groups during euglycemia (+5.8 × 104 and +5.8 × 104 copies, respectively) but decreased in healthy subjects during hyperglycemia (−1.4 × 104 copies). T1R2 levels increased significantly in type 2 diabetic patients under the same conditions (+6.9 × 105 copies). Plasma 3-OMG concentrations were significantly higher in type 2 diabetic patients than in healthy control subjects during acute hyperglycemia. Intestinal T1R2 expression is reciprocally regulated by luminal glucose in health according to glycemic status but is disordered in type 2 diabetes during acute hyperglycemia. This defect may enhance glucose absorption in type 2 diabetic patients and exacerbate postprandial hyperglycemia.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
STRs are well-described on subsets of enteroendocrine cells in the proximal small intestine, with evidence of STR-equipped K-cells, L-cells, and EC cells in humans.
“STRs are well-described on subsets of EEC in the proximal small intestine, with evidence of STR-equipped K-cells, L-cells, and EC cells in humans (21,22).”
From Gut mechanisms linking intestinal sweet sensing to glycemic control (2018) · cites this paper as [22]
T1R2 expression is decreased following enteral glucose exposure under hyperglycemic conditions in non-diabetic subjects, but remains elevated in patients with type 2 diabetes, where it is linked to increased glucose absorption assessed by serum 3-OMG.
“However, we found that T1R2 expression was decreased following enteral glucose exposure under hyperglycemic conditions in non-diabetic subjects, but remained elevated in patients with type 2 diabetes, where it was linked to an increase in glucose absorption (assessed by serum levels of 3-OMG which had been co-administered with the glucose load) (22).”
From Gut mechanisms linking intestinal sweet sensing to glycemic control (2018) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 111
- Authors
- Young, R. L., Chia, B., Isaacs, N. J., Ma, J., Khoo, J., Wu, T., Horowitz, M., & Rayner, C. K.
- Affiliations
- Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Changi General Hospital (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Young, Richard L.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2013-09-17
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3532-3541
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- PMC
- PMC3781477
- OpenAlex
- W2154044488
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- American Gastroenterological Association
- Diabetes Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council (627127, 519349)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Keywords
- T1R2, T1R3, type 2 diabetes, glucose absorption, hyperglycemia, duodenal epithelium, 3-O-methylglucose, postprandial hyperglycemia, gene expression regulation
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Epithelial Cells, Fasting, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Intestinal Absorption, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines, Male, Glucose Clamp Technique, Cross-Over Studies, 3-O-Methylglucose, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review