Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Susceptibility Variants on Quantitative Glycemic Traits Reveals Mechanistic Heterogeneity

Open access
Dimas, Antigone S., Lagou, Vasiliki, Barker, Adam, Knowles, Joshua W., Mägi, Reedik, Hivert, Marie-France, Benazzo, Andrea, Rybin, Denis, Jackson, Anne U., Stringham, Heather M., Song, Ci, Fischer-Rosinsky, Antje, Boesgaard, Trine Welløv, Grarup, Niels, Abbasi, Fahim A., Assimes, Themistocles L., Hao, Ke, Yang, Xia, Lecoeur, Cécile, Barroso, Inês, Bonnycastle, Lori L., Böttcher, Yvonne, Bumpstead, Suzannah, Chines, Peter S., Erdos, Michael R., Graessler, Jurgen, Kovacs, Peter, Morken, Mario A., Narisu, Narisu, Payne, Felicity, Stancakova, Alena, Swift, Amy J., Tönjes, Anke, Bornstein, Stefan R., Cauchi, Stéphane, Froguel, Philippe, Meyre, David, Schwarz, Peter E.H., Häring, Hans-Ulrich, Smith, Ulf, Boehnke, Michael, Bergman, Richard N., Collins, Francis S., Mohlke, Karen L., Tuomilehto, Jaakko, Quertemous, Thomas, Lind, Lars, Hansen, Torben, Pedersen, Oluf, Walker, Mark, Pfeiffer, Andreas F.H., Spranger, Joachim, Stumvoll, Michael, Meigs, James B., Wareham, Nicholas J., Kuusisto, Johanna, Laakso, Markku, Langenberg, Claudia, Dupuis, Josée, Watanabe, Richard M., Florez, Jose C., Ingelsson, Erik, McCarthy, Mark I., Prokopenko, Inga, on behalf of the MAGIC Investigators·2014·Diabetes
DOI 10.2337/db13-0949
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Patients with established type 2 diabetes display both β-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance. To define fundamental processes leading to the diabetic state, we examined the relationship between type 2 diabetes risk variants at 37 established susceptibility loci, and indices of proinsulin processing, insulin secretion, and insulin sensitivity. We included data from up to 58,614 nondiabetic subjects with basal measures and 17,327 with dynamic measures. We used additive genetic models with adjustment for sex, age, and BMI, followed by fixed-effects, inverse-variance meta-analyses. Cluster analyses grouped risk loci into five major categories based on their relationship to these continuous glycemic phenotypes. The first cluster (PPARG, KLF14, IRS1, GCKR) was characterized by primary effects on insulin sensitivity. The second cluster (MTNR1B, GCK) featured risk alleles associated with reduced insulin secretion and fasting hyperglycemia. ARAP1 constituted a third cluster characterized by defects in insulin processing. A fourth cluster (TCF7L2, SLC30A8, HHEX/IDE, CDKAL1, CDKN2A/2B) was defined by loci influencing insulin processing and secretion without a detectable change in fasting glucose levels. The final group contained 20 risk loci with no clear-cut associations to continuous glycemic traits. By assembling extensive data on continuous glycemic traits, we have exposed the diverse mechanisms whereby type 2 diabetes risk variants impact disease predisposition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db13-0949

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Dimas, A. S., Lagou, V., Barker, A., Knowles, J. W., Mägi, R., Hivert, M.-F., Benazzo, A., Rybin, D., Jackson, A. U., Stringham, H. M., Song, C., Fischer-Rosinsky, A., Boesgaard, T. W., Grarup, N., Abbasi, F. A., Assimes, T. L., Hao, K., Yang, X., Lecoeur, C., Barroso, I., Bonnycastle, L. L., Böttcher, Y., Bumpstead, S., Chines, P. S., Erdos, M. R., Graessler, J., Kovacs, P., Morken, M. A., Narisu, N., Payne, F., Stancakova, A., Swift, A. J., Tönjes, A., Bornstein, S. R., Cauchi, S., Froguel, P., Meyre, D., Schwarz, P. E. H., Häring, H.-U., Smith, U., Boehnke, M., Bergman, R. N., Collins, F. S., Mohlke, K. L., Tuomilehto, J., Quertemous, T., Lind, L., Hansen, T., Pedersen, O., Walker, M., Pfeiffer, A. F. H., Spranger, J., Stumvoll, M., Meigs, J. B., Wareham, N. J., Kuusisto, J., Laakso, M., Langenberg, C., Dupuis, J., Watanabe, R. M., Florez, J. C., Ingelsson, E., McCarthy, M. I., Prokopenko, I., & on behalf of the MAGIC Investigators
Venue
Diabetes
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Published
2014-05-15
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
2158-2171
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
DOI
10.2337/db13-0949
OpenAlex
W2106305501
Cited by
366
References
47
FWCI
21.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Susceptibility Variants on Quantitative Glycemic Traits Reveals Mechanistic Heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/db13-0949
The paper
Dimas, A. S., Lagou, V., Barker, A., Knowles, J. W., Mägi, R., Hivert, M.-F., Benazzo, A., Rybin, D., Jackson, A. U., Stringham, H. M., Song, C., Fischer-Rosinsky, A., Boesgaard, T. W., Grarup, N., Abbasi, F. A., Assimes, T. L., Hao, K., Yang, X., Lecoeur, C., . . . on behalf of the MAGIC Investigators. (2014). Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Susceptibility Variants on Quantitative Glycemic Traits Reveals Mechanistic Heterogeneity. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-0949

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.