Cited by 2Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsNutritional Studies and DietWater Treatment and Disinfection

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cross-Sectional Associations between Drinking Bottled Water and Prediabetes/Diabetes

JOSHIPURA, KAUMUDI J., TRAK, MARIA A., MUÑOZ-TORRES, FRANCISCO J.·2018·Diabetes

Abstract

Dietary recommendations for healthy adults include adequate hydration (males: 125 ounces/day, females: 91 ounces/day) from drinking water, other beverages, and water contained in food. Bottled water sales in U.S. exceeded 11.7 billion gallons in 2015 (36.5 gallons per capita). Low water intake, as well as some chemicals in water sources, are associated with hyperglycemia. However, the association between drinking water sources and hyperglycemia/diabetes has not been studied. In a cohort of overweight/obese Puerto Ricans, we evaluated the association between water sources (bottled and filtered compared to tap water) and prediabetes/diabetes. In 2014-2016, 1023 participants reported their primary source of water as bottled (52%), filtered (25%) and tap (23%); diabetes status was assessed using ADA criteria for fasting and 2-hour post load glucose, and HbA1c. Logistic regression models controlled for age, gender, waist circumference, smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, and hypertension. Bottled water consumers (compared to tap water) had higher prediabetes (OR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.01), and diabetes (OR=1.93; 95% CI: 1.08, 3.46). Further controlling for amount of water, sugar sweetened beverages, or canned food and drinks did not change the associations, but controlling for education or income strengthened the association with diabetes. Results were stronger when restricted to San Juan city residents (43%): prediabetes (OR=1.68; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.79), and diabetes (OR=4.05; 95% CI: 1.48, 11.1). Filtered water users had somewhat higher prediabetes/diabetes (OR=1.38; 95% CI: 0.93, 2.04) compared to tap water users. Results suggest that drinking bottled water may be associated with higher prevalence of diabetes compared to tap water, potentially mediated by endocrine disruptors in plastic bottles. We cannot determine time sequence or causality, given the cross-sectional analyses. The impact of water sources on diabetes risk needs to be further evaluated longitudinally. Disclosure: K.J. Joshipura: None. M.A. Trak: None. F.J. Muñoz-Torres: None.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db18-197-lb

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
JOSHIPURA, K. J., TRAK, M. A., & MUÑOZ-TORRES, F. J.
Affiliations
San Juan, PR
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2018-07-01
Volume
67
Issue
Supplement_1
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2809046109
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Diabetes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
Keywords
bottled water, filtered water, tap water, prediabetes, water sources, endocrine disruptors, plastic bottles, Puerto Ricans, overweight and obesity, hyperglycemia, hydration, San Juan, Puerto Rico, socioeconomic factors, education and income, sugar-sweetened beverages, HbA1c, diabetes risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review