Cited by 5Diabetes Management and ResearchIntravenous Infusion Technology and SafetyCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

1012-P: Study of Insulin Stability Impact on Pump Therapy: Test Model Development

CHATTARAJ, SARNATH, ZHANG, GINA, ANSELMO, EVAN, FUSSELMAN, JENNY (HSI) C.·2020·Diabetes

Abstract

Objective: Develop a test methodology for evaluating the reason for infusion set (IS) failure in persons with diabetes using insulin pump therapy (Continuous Sub-cutaneous Insulin Infusion, CSII). Insulin stability (physical, chemical, and microbiological) and/or the loss of preservatives in the infusate are thought to play significant roles in shortening IS wear time. In-vitro and in-vivo methods were used to assess the cause(s) site inflammation and the loss of preservatives. Method: Fast-acting insulin (insulin aspart and lispro) were pumped through different infusion sets (>4) under simulated-use conditions. The pumped insulin and non-pumped insulin controls were characterized for physical, chemical, and microbiological properties. The pumped insulin, combined with fibrinogen (an initiator for material foreign body responses), were tested in murine macrophage cell culture for inflammatory responses. The corresponding infusion sets were tested in vivo in a diabetic porcine model to determine IS wear-time. Result: Pumped insulins in ≥8 insulin/IS combinations met corresponding criteria in USP insulin monographs, indicating no significant chemical changes. Lower preservative content was found to increase insulin aggregates in-vitro/in-vivo. Pro-inflammatory cytokines (MIP-1α, and MCP-1) increased significantly in the inflammatory in-vitro model. The IS wear-time was shortened from 4.9±0.3 days (control) to 1.7±0.3 days (p<0.0001) with lower preservative content (<50% per label claim). Conclusion: Preliminary findings from in-vitro and in-vivo test model development indicate that macrophage number, the inflammatory response, and device wear time were significantly impacted by loss of preservative and trace aggregates/particles. The new test methodology can further our understanding as to how to improve IS wear time. Disclosure: S. Chattaraj: Employee; Self; Medtronic. G. Zhang: None. E. Anselmo: Employee; Self; Medtronic. J.C. Fusselman: None.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db20-1012-p

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
CHATTARAJ, S., ZHANG, G., ANSELMO, E., & FUSSELMAN, J. (. C.
Affiliations
Northridge, CA
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
69
Issue
Supplement_1
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W3034515739
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Diabetes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Keywords
insulin pump therapy, insulin stability, insulin aspart, insulin lispro, fast-acting insulin, fibrinogen, macrophage inflammation, inflammatory cytokines, MIP-1α, MCP-1, porcine model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review