The DOI matches its Crossref record.
1012-P: Study of Insulin Stability Impact on Pump Therapy: Test Model Development
Abstract
Objective: Develop a test methodology for evaluating the reason for infusion set (IS) failure in persons with diabetes using insulin pump therapy (Continuous Sub-cutaneous Insulin Infusion, CSII). Insulin stability (physical, chemical, and microbiological) and/or the loss of preservatives in the infusate are thought to play significant roles in shortening IS wear time. In-vitro and in-vivo methods were used to assess the cause(s) site inflammation and the loss of preservatives. Method: Fast-acting insulin (insulin aspart and lispro) were pumped through different infusion sets (>4) under simulated-use conditions. The pumped insulin and non-pumped insulin controls were characterized for physical, chemical, and microbiological properties. The pumped insulin, combined with fibrinogen (an initiator for material foreign body responses), were tested in murine macrophage cell culture for inflammatory responses. The corresponding infusion sets were tested in vivo in a diabetic porcine model to determine IS wear-time. Result: Pumped insulins in ≥8 insulin/IS combinations met corresponding criteria in USP insulin monographs, indicating no significant chemical changes. Lower preservative content was found to increase insulin aggregates in-vitro/in-vivo. Pro-inflammatory cytokines (MIP-1α, and MCP-1) increased significantly in the inflammatory in-vitro model. The IS wear-time was shortened from 4.9±0.3 days (control) to 1.7±0.3 days (p<0.0001) with lower preservative content (<50% per label claim). Conclusion: Preliminary findings from in-vitro and in-vivo test model development indicate that macrophage number, the inflammatory response, and device wear time were significantly impacted by loss of preservative and trace aggregates/particles. The new test methodology can further our understanding as to how to improve IS wear time. Disclosure: S. Chattaraj: Employee; Self; Medtronic. G. Zhang: None. E. Anselmo: Employee; Self; Medtronic. J.C. Fusselman: None.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Insulin degradation and preservative loss increased the inflammatory response.
“based on observations that insulin degradation and preservative loss increased the inflammatory response10”
From Evaluation of Extended Infusion Set Performance in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Infusion Set Survival Rate and Glycemic Outcomes from a Pivotal Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brazg, R., Garg, S. K., Bhargava, A., Thrasher, J. R., Latif, K., Bode, B. W., Bailey, T. S., Horowitz, B. S., Cavale, A., Kudva, Y. C., et al. (2022) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2021.0540 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- CHATTARAJ, S., ZHANG, G., ANSELMO, E., & FUSSELMAN, J. (. C.
- Affiliations
- Northridge, CA
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2020-06-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W3034515739
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Keywords
- insulin pump therapy, insulin stability, insulin aspart, insulin lispro, fast-acting insulin, fibrinogen, macrophage inflammation, inflammatory cytokines, MIP-1α, MCP-1, porcine model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review