The DOI matches its Crossref record.
986-P: Assessment of Adhesive Patches for an Extended-Wear Infusion Set
Abstract
Objective: The durability of wearable devices, e.g., insulin infusion sets (IIS), is challenged by external factors such as friction, movement, stretch, moisture, and skin viscoelasticity. Such factors are difficult to investigate in non-clinical settings. We assessed 3 new adhesive patches and compared them to those used with current Medtronic infusion sets to determine which would be suitable for an extended wear infusion set with intended wear time of up to 7 days. Method: Seventy-five adults were recruited in 3 studies to wear 2 patch variants each on conventional IIS sites, for up to 8 days. Non-functional Medtronic pumps were used to simulate use conditions. The primary outcome was wear time. Secondary outcomes included edge lift and descriptive user feedback (e.g., appearance, comfort, irritation score, residue upon removal, and removal discomfort). Results: The results (Figure 1) demonstrated that the 7-day survival rate for existing IIS patches varied from ∼70% to ∼90%. These data indicated that the hub form factor played an insignificant role in the adhesive patch wear time. Two of three new adhesive patches had a 7-day survival rate ≥95% without significantly impacting user experience (i.e., wear comfort or skin reactions). Conclusion: In the simulated-use studies, two new adhesive patches met the primary and secondary outcomes for use with an extended wear infusion set. Disclosure: G. Zhang: None. S. Chattaraj: Employee; Self; Medtronic. E. Anselmo: Employee; Self; Medtronic. L. Hoffman: None. M. Tran: None. S. Bondy: Employee; Self; Medtronic. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Medtronic.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The new EIS includes a new extended-wear adhesive patch that improves skin adherence.
“in addition to a new extended-wear adhesive patch that improves skin adherence.13”
From Evaluation of Extended Infusion Set Performance in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Infusion Set Survival Rate and Glycemic Outcomes from a Pivotal Trial (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brazg, R., Garg, S. K., Bhargava, A., Thrasher, J. R., Latif, K., Bode, B. W., Bailey, T. S., Horowitz, B. S., Cavale, A., Kudva, Y. C., et al. (2022) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2021.0540 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ZHANG, G., CHATTARAJ, S., ANSELMO, E., HOFFMAN, L., TRAN, M., & BONDY, S.
- Affiliations
- Northridge, CA
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2020-06-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W3034332620
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- adhesive patch, wear time, skin irritation, user comfort, wearable devices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review