Cited by 202Regulation of Appetite and ObesityDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

GIP receptor agonism attenuates GLP-1 receptor agonist induced nausea and emesis in preclinical models

Open access
Borner, Tito, Geisler, Caroline E., Fortin, Samantha M., Cosgrove, Richard, Alsina-Fernandez, Jorge, Dogra, Mridula, Doebley, Sarah, Sanchez-Navarro, Marcos J. +12 more·2021·Diabetes

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists decrease body weight and improve glycemic control in obesity and diabetes. Patient compliance and maximal efficacy of GLP-1 therapeutics are limited by adverse side effects, including nausea and emesis. In three different species (i.e., mice, rats, and musk shrews), we show that glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) signaling blocks emesis and attenuates illness behaviors elicited by GLP-1R activation, while maintaining reduced food intake, body weight loss, and improved glucose tolerance. The area postrema and nucleus tractus solitarius (AP/NTS) of the hindbrain are required for food intake and body weight suppression by GLP-1R ligands and processing of emetic stimuli. Using single-nuclei RNA sequencing, we identified the cellular phenotypes of AP/NTS cells expressing GIPR and GLP-1R on distinct populations of inhibitory and excitatory neurons, with the greatest expression of GIPR in γ-aminobutyric acid-ergic neurons. This work suggests that combinatorial pharmaceutical targeting of GLP-1R and GIPR will increase efficacy in treating obesity and diabetes by reducing nausea and vomiting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db21-0459

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GIPR modulation can serve both to enhance the anorectic effects of GLP-1R agonism and facilitate additional weight loss through other putative mechanisms such as improvement in insulin sensitivity and reduction in GLP-1R mediated adverse gastrointestinal events.

    “These data demonstrate that GIPR modulation can serve both to enhance the anorectic effects of GLP-1R agonism and facilitate additional weight loss through other putative mechanisms such as improvement in insulin sensitivity [30] and reduction in GLP-1R mediated adverse gastrointestinal events to permit increased GLP-1R engagement [39]”

    From Next generation GLP-1/GIP/glucagon triple agonists normalize body weight in obese mice (2022) · cites this paper as [39]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GIP inhibits hindbrain neurons regulating emesis.

    “Furthermore, GIP inhibits hindbrain neurons regulating emesis [25]”

    From Triple Agonism Based Therapies for Obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results section reports that GIPR agonist cotreatment reduced GLP-1R agonist–induced neuronal activation in the hindbrain AP/NTS and prevented emesis in shrews. The Discussion says local inhibitory neurons may mediate this effect, but presents that mechanism as a hypothesis; it does not establish that GIP directly inhibits emesis-regulating neurons generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • GIP agonism reduces emesis caused by a GLP-1 receptor agonist in both rodent and human studies.

    “and GIP agonism reduces emesis caused by a GLP-1 RA in both rodent and human studies [25, 26].”

    From Triple Agonism Based Therapies for Obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results report that GIP agonism reduced GLP-1 agonist–induced pica in rats, but explicitly say rodents lack the emetic reflex; actual vomiting was prevented in musk shrews. The Discussion reports fewer gastrointestinal adverse events with dual GIP/GLP-1 agonists in human trials, while noting that nausea and emesis still occurred. Thus the paper supports the general antiemetic point, but not a reduction in emesis measured in rodent studies. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In preclinical models, the addition of GIPR agonism to GLP-1R agonism attenuates emesis while increasing the amount of body weight reduction compared to GLP-1 agonism alone.

    “In preclinical models, the addition of GIPR agonism to GLP-1R agonism attenuates emesis while increasing the amount of body weight reduction compared to GLP-1 agonism alone [98].”

    From Dual and Triple Incretin-Based Co-agonists: Novel Therapeutics for Obesity and Diabetes (2024) · cites this paper as [98]

    The Results section reports that GIPR agonist cotreatment prevented GLP-1R agonist–induced emesis in shrews. It does not support increased weight loss: cotreatment did not enhance the body-weight-lowering effect in shrews and attenuated weight loss in rats. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Preclinical evidence indicates that GIPR agonism attenuates GLP-1R agonist-induced nausea and emesis.

    “In fact there is evidence in preclinical studies that GIPR agonism attenuates GLP-1R agonist-induced nausea and emesis [98].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 202

Authors
Borner, T., Geisler, C. E., Fortin, S. M., Cosgrove, R., Alsina-Fernandez, J., Dogra, M., Doebley, S., Sanchez-Navarro, M. J., Leon, R. M., Gaisinsky, J., White, A., Bamezai, A., Ghidewon, M. Y., Grill, H. J., Crist, R. C., Reiner, B. C., Ai, M., Samms, R. J., De Jonghe, B. C., & Hayes, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
  • Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Corresponding author
Hayes, Matthew R.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2021-08-11
Volume
70
Issue
11
Pages
2545-2553
ISSN
0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3187492301
Cited by
202
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 5
FWCI
13.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (186728)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK021397, R56DK021397, R01DK112812)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
GIP receptor, GLP-1 receptor agonists, nausea and vomiting, vomiting, area postrema, nucleus tractus solitarius, dietary intake, weight loss, glucose tolerance, GABAergic neurons, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, obesity, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Animals, Body Weight, Feeding Behavior, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nausea, Receptors, Gastrointestinal Hormone, Shrews, Vomiting, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review