Cited by 14Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comparison of Daily Glucose Fluctuation Between GCK-MODY and Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Glucokinase variant-induced maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY) exhibits the unique clinical features of mild fasting hyperglycemia. However, formal studies of its glucose excursion pattern in daily life in comparison with those with or without other types of diabetes are lacking. We conducted a case-control study including 25 patients with GCK-MODY, 25 A1C-matched, drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and 25 age-, BMI-, and sex-matched subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT). All the subjects wore flash glucose monitoring (FGM) sensors for 2 weeks, and glucose readings were masked. Glucose excursion was significantly lower in the GCK-MODY than that in A1C-matched T2DM during the daytime, but was similar during the nighttime. The daytime coefficient of variation (CV) driven by postprandial glucose could separate GCK-MODY from well-controlled T2DM, but the nighttime CV could not. In discriminating between GCK-MODY and T2DM, the area under the curve of the CV was 0.875. However, in GCK-MODY and NGT subjects, the CVs were similar at 24 h, whereas the other four excursion parameters were significantly higher in GCK-MODY than those in NGT subjects. FGM confirmed the stability and mildness of hyperglycemia in GCK-MODY patients. Postprandial regulation is a key driver of the difference in excursion between GCK-MODY and T2DM.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db22-0566

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Naylor, 2018, Maturity-onset diabetes of the young overview, 1993
  2. IBM Corporation, SPSS version 23 for Windows
  3. MedCalc, MedCalc Statistical Software version 19.0

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ren, Q., Zhang, P., Pang, W., Ma, Y., Gong, S., Ba, T., Liu, W., Zhang, F., Zhang, X., Zhang, R., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Yang, W., Lv, F., Gao, L., Han, X., & Ji, L.
Affiliations
  • Peking University People's Hospital (CN)
  • Henan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Han, Xueyao
  • Ji, Linong
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2023-03-20
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
812-818
ISSN
0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4327902056
Cited by
14
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC1304901)
  • Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology (D131100005313008, Z201100005520012)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
GCK-MODY, type 2 diabetes, glucose fluctuations, glycemic variability, flash glucose monitoring, postprandial blood glucose, coefficient of variation, fasting hyperglycemia, nocturnal glucose
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucokinase, Glucose, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Mutation, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review