Cited by 7Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

754-P: Effect of Retatrutide on Kidney Parameters in People with Type 2 Diabetes and/or Obesity—A Post-Hoc Analysis of Two Phase 2 Trials

HEERSPINK, HIDDO L., LU, ZEQING, DU, YU, DUFFIN, KEVIN L., COSKUN, TAMER, HAUPT, AXEL, HARTMAN, MARK L.·2024·Diabetes

Abstract

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease due to T2D and obesity is rapidly increasing. Retatrutide (RETA), an agonist of GIP, GLP-1 and glucagon receptors, showed marked effects in reducing body weight and HbA1c in people with T2D and/or obesity/overweight (OB). This post-hoc analysis assessed the impact of RETA on kidney parameters. Data from all participants in 2 phase 2 studies were included: T2D (N=281): RETA (0.5, 4, 8, 12 mg) vs dulaglutide 1.5 mg vs PBO (N=45-50/arm); OB (non-T2D; N=338): RETA (1, 4, 8, 12 mg) vs PBO (N=62-70/arm). Assessments included CKD-EPI creatinine eGFR (Cr-eGFR), cystatin C-based eGFR and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). Change from baseline was analyzed using mixed models for repeated measures; pairwise contrasts were used to compare RETA to PBO. At 36 wks in T2D, no difference was observed in Cr-eGFR between all RETA groups and PBO; UACR was significantly reduced vs PBO with RETA 12 mg (Fig). In OB, RETA 8 and 12 mg increased Cr-eGFR and decreased UACR compared to PBO at 48 wks. Results were similar when GFR was estimated from cystatin C. Blood pressure (BP) was significantly reduced in both studies. RETA 8 and 12 mg increased eGFR in people with OB but not in those with T2D. UACR and BP were reduced vs PBO with higher doses of RETA in both trials. These data suggest possible benefits on kidney function that warrant further investigation in larger populations. Disclosure: H.L. Heerspink: Consultant; AstraZeneca, Bayer Inc., Boehringer-Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Eli Lilly and Company. Advisory Panel; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Consultant; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk, Traveere Pharmaceuticals. Z. Lu: None. Y. Du: None. K.L. Duffin: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. T. Coskun: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. A. Haupt: Employee; Lilly Diabetes. Stock/Shareholder; Lilly Diabetes. M.L. Hartman: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. Funding: Eli Lilly and Company

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db24-754-p

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HEERSPINK, H. L., LU, Z., DU, Y., DUFFIN, K. L., COSKUN, T., HAUPT, A., & HARTMAN, M. L.
Affiliations
Groningen, Netherlands, Indianapolis, IN
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2024-06-14
Volume
73
Issue
Supplement_1
ISSN
0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399684363
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Diabetes (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
retatrutide, type 2 diabetes, obesity, chronic kidney disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate, cystatin C, albumin-creatinine ratio, dulaglutide, blood pressure, renal function, weight loss, glycemic control, dose-response relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review