Cited by 20Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Kidney Parameters with Tirzepatide in Obesity with or without Type 2 Diabetes

Open access
Heerspink, Hiddo J.L., Friedman, Allon N., Bjornstad, Petter, van Raalte, Daniel H., Cherney, David, Cao, Dachuang, Garcia-Pérez, Luis-Emilio, Stefanski, Adam +5 more·2025·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

Key Points: People with obesity and/or type 2 diabetes are at higher risk of progressive kidney function loss. We assessed the association of tirzepatide use with kidney function parameters in people with overweight/obesity with or without type 2 diabetes. Tirzepatide treatment was associated with urine albumin-to-creatinine reduction after 24 weeks, which was sustained through week 72, and no change in eGFR. Background: Tirzepatide, a once-weekly, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, showed kidney-protective effects in people with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular disease risk. In this post hoc analysis of the SURMOUNT-1 and SURMOUNT-2 trials, we assessed the association of tirzepatide use with kidney function parameters in people with overweight/obesity with or without type 2 diabetes. Methods: In SURMOUNT-1, participants with overweight or obesity without type 2 diabetes were randomized to tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg or placebo. In SURMOUNT-2, participants with type 2 diabetes were randomized to tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg or placebo. For this analysis, all tirzepatide groups were pooled in each trial. Assessments included change from baseline to week 72 for urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and eGFR. eGFR was assessed using creatinine-based eGFR, cystatin-C–based eGFR, and creatinine-cystatin-C–based eGFR (Cr-Cys-C-eGFR). Results: In SURMOUNT-1 ( N =2539) and SURMOUNT-2 ( N =938), the median (25th–75th percentile) baseline UACR was 6.0 (4.0–11.0) mg/g and 13.0 (6.0–35.1) mg/g, respectively. UACR estimated difference for tirzepatide versus placebo, at week 72 was−8.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], −14.7 to −1.6) for SURMOUNT-1 and −31.1% (95% CI, −40.9 to −19.7) for SURMOUNT-2. The UACR change was more pronounced among participants with baseline UACR ≥30 mg/g with placebo-corrected changes from baseline at week 72 of −42.3% (95% CI, −60.8 to −15.0) in SURMOUNT-1 and −55.2% (95% CI, −68.5 to −36.4) in SURMOUNT-2, respectively. In SURMOUNT-1, tirzepatide was associated with increased eGFR based on cystatin-C–based eGFR or Cr-Cys-C-eGFR estimation equations, with mean differences versus placebo at week 72 of 3.2 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (95% CI, 2.1 to 4.3) and 1.9 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 (95% CI, 0.9 to 2.9), respectively. In SURMOUNT-2 at week 72, increases in both tirzepatide and placebo groups were observed for Cys-C or Cr-Cys-C-eGFR, with no between-group differences. Conclusions: In participants with obesity/overweight with or without type 2 diabetes, tirzepatide was associated with reduced albuminuria without adverse changes in eGFR. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: SURMOUNT-1: NCT04184622; SURMOUNT-2: NCT04657003.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1681/asn.0000000764

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heerspink, H. J. L., Friedman, A. N., Bjornstad, P., van Raalte, D. H., Cherney, D., Cao, D., Garcia-Pérez, L.-E., Stefanski, A., Turfanda, I., Bunck, M. C., Benabbad, I., Griffin, R., & Piras de Oliveira, C.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
Corresponding author
Heerspink, Hiddo J.L.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-06-13
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
2190-2200
ISSN
  • 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-3450
OpenAlex
W4411276022
Cited by
20
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9
FWCI
13.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company, manufacturer of tirzepatide
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
tirzepatide, obesity, type 2 diabetes, renal function, albuminuria, albumin-creatinine ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate, cystatin C, renal safety, GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, weight loss, cardiovascular risk, kidney disease progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review